Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013
Population pharmacokinetics of escalating doses of caspofungin in a phase II study of patients with invasive aspergillosis.
Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00404092 (A Phase II Dose Escalation Study of Caspofungin in Patients With Invasive Aspergillosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase II Dose Escalation Study of Caspofungin in Patients With Invasive Aspergillosis
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Pooled it
- Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Guideline
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Rezafungin (CD101) Efficacy Using Phase 1 Data.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018Trial
- Physiology-based pharmacokinetics of caspofungin for adults and paediatrics.Pharmaceutical research · 2015Trial
- Caspofungin enhances antifungal immunity in human blood through transcriptional reprogramming.microLife · 2026Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-an ASAP ECMO study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- The distinctive pharmacokinetic profile of rezafungin, a long-acting echinocandin developed in the era of modern pharmacometrics.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Review
- Predictors of caspofungin exposure-response relationship: a retrospective cohort study on therapeutic drug monitoring parameters.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Echinocandins Pharmacokinetics: A Comprehensive Review of Micafungin, Caspofungin, Anidulafungin, and Rezafungin Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Dose Optimization in Special Populations.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Review
- Antifungal drug penetration in soft tissue abscesses: a comparative analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Development and Quality Control of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model Library for Caspofungin.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Population Pharmacokinetics of Caspofungin and Dose Simulations in Heart Transplant Recipients.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Caspofungin Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis in Plasma and Peritoneal Fluid in Septic Patients with Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Prospective Cohort Study.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Article
- Assessment of Caspofungin use at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital and compliance with IDSA guidelines and FDA labelings.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022Article
- Hydrolytic Enzymes as Potentiators of Antimicrobials against an Inter-Kingdom Biofilm Model.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin, Meropenem, Caspofungin, and Their Combinations againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Article
- The recommended dosage regimen for caspofungin in patients with higher body weight or hypoalbuminaemia will result in low exposure: Five years of data based on a population pharmacokinetic model and Monte-Carlo simulations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Unique mechanistic insights into pathways associated with the synergistic activity of polymyxin B and caspofungin against multidrug-resistantComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Echinocandins against Aspergillus fumigatus Using anAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- Impact of Loading Dose of Caspofungin in Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Severe Candidiasis Infections in Patients in Intensive Care Units: the CASPOLOAD Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caspofungin (CAS) is approved for second-line management of proven or probable invasive aspergillosis at a dose of 50 mg once daily (QD). Preclinical and limited clinical data support the concept of the dose-dependent antifungal efficacy of CAS with preservation of its favorable safety profile. Little is known, however, about the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of higher doses of CAS in patients. In a formal multicenter phase II dose-escalation study, CAS was administered as a 2-h infusion at doses ranging from 70 to 200 mg QD. CAS PK sampling (n = 468 samples) was performed on day 1 and at peak and trough time points on days 4, 7, 14, and 28 (70 mg, n = 9 patients; 100 mg, n = 8 patients; 150 mg, n = 9 patients; 200 mg, n = 20 patients; total, n = 46 patients). Drug concentrations in plasma were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy. Population pharmacokinetic analysis (PopPK) was performed using NONMEM (version 7) software. Model evaluation was performed using bootstrap analysis, prediction-corrected visual predictive check (pcVPC), as well as standardized visual predictive check (SVPC). The four investigated dose levels showed no difference in log-transformed dose-normalized trough levels of CAS (analysis of variance). CAS concentration data fitted best to a two-compartment model with a proportional-error model, interindividual variability (IIV) fitted best on clearance (CL), central and peripheral volume of distribution (V(1) and V(2), respectively) covariance fitted best on CL and V(1), interoccasion variability (IOV) fitted best on CL, and body weight fitted best as a covariate on CL and V(1) (CL, 0.411 liters/h ± 29% IIV; IOV on CL, 16%; V(1), 5.785 liters ± 29% IIV; intercompartmental clearance, 0.843 liters/h; V2, 6.53 liters ± 67% IIV). None of the other examined covariates (dose level, gender, age, serum bilirubin concentration, creatinine clearance) improved the model further. Bootstrap results showed the robustness of the final PopPK model. pcVPC and SVPC showed the predictability of the model and further confirmed the linear PKs of CAS over the dosage range of 70 to 200 mg QD. On the basis of the final model, geometric mean simulated peak plasma levels at steady state ranged from 13.8 to 39.4 mg/liter (geometric coefficient of variation, 31%), geometric mean trough levels ranged from 4.2 to 12.0 mg/liter (49%), and geometric mean areas under the concentration-time curves ranged from 170 to 487 mg · h/liter (34%) for the dosage range of 70 to 200 mg QD. CAS showed linear PKs across the investigated dosage range of 70 to 200 mg QD. Drug exposure in the present study population was comparable to that in other populations. (This study has been registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials website under registration no. 2006-001936-30 and at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00404092.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.