Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23335488›Full record

ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2013

Research priorities for FCTC Articles 20, 21, and 22: surveillance/evaluation and information exchange.

Gary A Giovino, Jessica A Kulak, William D Kalsbeek, Scott J Leischow

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Converging research needs across framework convention on tobacco control articles: making research relevant to global tobacco control practice and policy.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gary A GiovinoDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, USA. ggiovino@buffalo.edu
Jessica A Kulak
William D Kalsbeek
Scott J Leischow
Buffalo State University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Carolina Population CenterR24HD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MORGAN, SAMUEL PHILIP · 2005 to 2014
$10.0M
Networks Among Tribal Organizations for Clean Air Policiies (NATO CAP)U01CA154300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEISCHOW, SCOTT J · 2011 to 2015
$4.9M
Knowledge Integration in Quitlines: Networks that Improve CessationR01CA128638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI LEISCHOW, SCOTT J · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA128638NCI NIH HHS R01-CA128638NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154300NCI NIH HHS U01CA154300NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFramework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Articles 20, 21, and 22 call for strong monitoring and reporting of tobacco use and factors influencing use and disease (Articles 20 and 21) and for collaboration among the Parties and relevant organizations to share resources, knowledge, and expertise on all relevant tobacco control strategies (Article 22).

methodsThis paper provides background information and discusses research strategies that would strengthen these efforts and better inform the parties. By necessity, Articles 20 and 21 are discussed separately from Article 22, although 1 example that relates to both 20/21 and 22 is discussed at the end.

resultsTwelve important research opportunities on surveillance and evaluation are recognized, along with 4 on collaboration. The authors believe that the 6 most important areas for research would study (a) possible underreporting of tobacco use among certain demographic groups in some countries, (b) measures of industry activities, (c) optimal sampling strategies, (d) sentinel surveillance, (e) networks of tobacco companies and their partners as they promote tobacco use and interfere with implementation of the FCTC, and (f) network/relationship factors that impact diffusion of knowledge and decision making on the implementation of the FCTC. In addition, we call for a review process of existing surveillance and evaluation strategies to coordinate activities to make optimal use of existing resources. This activity would involve networking as prescribed in Article 22.

conclusionsStudies and activities such as these would facilitate control of the tobacco epidemic.

Indexed as

Health PromotionInternational CooperationResearchSmoking PreventionGovernment RegulationHealth CommunicationHealth PolicyHumansSentinel SurveillanceTobacco IndustryTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID23335488
PMCPMC3601915
OpenAlexW2146746721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.