Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23335115›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2013

Translational research in nicotine dependence.

Jill R Turner, Allison Gold, Robert Schnoll, Julie A Blendy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jill R TurnerDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Allison Gold
Robert Schnoll
Julie A Blendy

Funding

Neuroimaging Abstinence and Medication ResponseP50CA143187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLENDY, JULIE A, LERMAN, CARYN · 2009 to 2013
$8.6M
Pharmacogenomic Analysis of Nicotine DependenceR00DA032681 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI TURNER, JILL R. · 2014 to 2016
$741k
Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Anxiety and DepressionF32DA026236 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TURNER, JILL R. · 2009 to 2011
$151k
Pharmacogenomic Analysis of Nicotine DependenceK99DA032681 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TURNER, JILL R. · 2013 to 2013
$133k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA143187NCI NIH HHS P50-CA-143187NIDA NIH HHS 1-F32-DA026236NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA026236NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA032681NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA032681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine addiction accounts for 4.9 million deaths each year. Furthermore, although smoking represents a significant health burden in the United States, at present there are only three FDA-approved pharmacotherapies currently on the market: (1) nicotine replacement therapy, (2) bupropion, and (3) varenicline. Despite this obvious gap in the market, the complexity of nicotine addiction in addition to the increasing cost of drug development makes targeted drug development prohibitive. Furthermore, using combinations of mouse and human studies, additional treatments could be developed from off-the-shelf, currently approved medication lists. This article reviews translational studies targeting manipulations of the cholinergic system as a viable therapeutic target for nicotine addiction.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAcetylcholineAnimalsCholinergic AntagonistsCholinesterase InhibitorsHumansMiceNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, NicotinicRodentiaSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco Use DisorderAcetylcholineCholinergic AntagonistsCholinesterase InhibitorsNicotineNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID23335115
PMCPMC3579204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.