Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23335050›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2013

Initial testing (stage 1) of temozolomide by the pediatric preclinical testing program.

Stephen T Keir, John M Maris, C Patrick Reynolds, Min H Kang, E Anders Kolb, Richard Gorlick, Richard Lock, Hernan Carol, Christopher L Morton, Jianrong Wu and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen T KeirDuke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. keir0001@mc.duke.edu
John M Maris
C Patrick Reynolds
Min H Kang
E Anders Kolb
Richard Gorlick
Richard Lock
Hernan Carol
Christopher L Morton
Jianrong Wu
Raushan T Kurmasheva
Peter J Houghton
Malcolm A Smith
Children's Cancer Institute Australia · AUNationwide Children's Hospital · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · USChildren's Hospital at Montefiore · USDuke University · USDuPont (United States) · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
TEMODAR RESISTANCE IN CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMP50CA108786 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BIGNER, DARELL D · 2004 to 2009
$12.3M
ANTINEOPLASTIC ALKYLGLYCEROLIPIDSR01CA042216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PIANTADOSI, CLAUDE · 1988 to 1990
–
NCI NIH HHS CA108786NCI NIH HHS CA21765NCI NIH HHS N01 CM042216NCI NIH HHS N01-CM-42216NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DNA methylating agent temozolomide was developed primarily for treatment of glioblastoma. However, preclinical data have suggested a broader application for treatment of childhood cancer. Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP solid tumor and ALL models. PROCEDURES: Temozolomide was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1,000 µM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at doses from 22 to 100 mg/kg administered orally daily for 5 days, repeated at day 21.

resultsIn vitro temozolomide showed cytotoxicity with a median relative IC50 (rIC50 ) value of 380 µM against the PPTP cell lines (range 1 to > 1,000 µM). The three lines with rIC50 values lesser than 10 µM had low MGMT expression compared to the remaining cell lines. In vivo temozolomide demonstrated significant toxicity at 100 mg/kg, but induced tumor regressions in 15 of 23 evaluable solid tumor models (13 maintained CR [MCR], 2 CR) and 5 of 8 ALL models (3 MCR, 2 CR). There was a steep dose response curve, with lower activity at 66 mg/kg temozolomide and with tumor regressions at 22 and 44 mg/kg restricted to models with low MGMT expression.

conclusionsTemozolomide demonstrated high level antitumor activity against both solid tumor and leukemia models, but also elicited significant toxicity at the highest dose level. Lowering the dose of TMZ to more closely match clinical exposures markedly reduced the antitumor activity for many xenograft lines with responsiveness at lower doses closely related to low MGMT expression.

Indexed as

Drug Screening Assays, AntitumorAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingCell Line, TumorDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, SCIDNeoplasmsNeoplasm TransplantationTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23335050
PMCPMC4244112
OpenAlexW2056335963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.