Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23334619›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2013

Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.

Paul J Mitchell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Approach to the Patient With Bone Fracture: Making the First Fracture the Last.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  14. Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
  15. Preventing hip fractures with multidisciplinary teams: a Canadian perspective.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Clinical Impact of Fracture Liaison Services: A Systematic Review.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  20. Multiple simultaneous fractures are associated with higher all-cause mortality: results from a province-wide fracture liaison service.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul J MitchellSynthesis Medical NZ Limited, 3 Harris Street, Pukekohe 2120, New Zealand. pauljames.mitchell@me.com
Chemical Synthesis Lab · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been demonstrated in many countries to provide an effective means to deliver secondary preventive care for patients presenting with fragility fractures. This review provides an update on journal articles, reports, guidelines and government policies, with relevance to FLS, which have been published during the period 2009-2012. International evidence of the extent and persistence of the secondary fracture prevention care gap has expanded during this period. Major professional and patient societies throughout the world, including the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, have supported international initiatives to disseminate best practice. Health economic analysis of FLS has developed considerably, with a consistent theme from investigator-led and government analyses that FLS provide highly cost-effective care. Opportunities to close the care gap, in a systematic way, for unrecognised vertebral fracture sufferers are also considered.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementHumansIncidenceInternational CooperationOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPractice Patterns, Physicians'Secondary Prevention

Identifiers

PMID23334619
OpenAlexW1964853375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.