Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23334573›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2013

Adherence with medications used to treat osteoporosis: behavioral insights.

John T Schousboe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving adherence to and persistence with oral therapy of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Trial
  2. Approach to personalizing the treatment of osteoporosis.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-term persistence in patients with osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice: 36-month non-interventional, observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women's perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the Risk-Stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Article
  9. Persistence at 12 months with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: interim results from a prospective observational study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2015
    Observational
  10. Review
  11. Local strategies to prevent and treat osteoporosis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

John T SchousboePark Nicollet Osteoporosis Center and Park Nicollet Institute for Research and Education, Park Nicollet Health Services, 3800 Park Nicollet Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA. John.Schousboe@ParkNicollet.com
Park Nicollet Health Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-persistence (never starting or stopping medication prematurely) and non-compliance (taking medication inappropriately) with fracture prevention medication among those at high risk of fracture remain significant barriers to optimal reduction of osteoporotic fractures. Current research suggest that for patients to persist and comply with prescriptions for fracture prevention medication, they need to believe that they are at significant risk of fracture, that the prescribed medication can safely reduce their risk of fracture without exposing them to long-term harm, that equally effective non-medicinal therapies are not available, and that they can successfully execute medication use in the context of their daily task demands. Further research is needed to understand; a) the mental models of osteoporosis, fractures, and medications used to treat osteoporosis that patients employ when making decisions as to whether or not to take fracture prevention medication; and b) how patients arbitrage information from various sources (health care providers, family, friends, and other sources) to formulate their beliefs about osteoporosis and medications used to treat it.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthBone Density Conservation AgentsHealth BehaviorHumansOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPatient CompliancePhysician-Patient RelationsRisk FactorsBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID23334573
OpenAlexW2071312764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.