Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23334506›Full record

Trial reportJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2013

Appropriateness of hydroxyethylcellulose gel as a placebo control in vaginal microbicide trials: a comparison of the two control arms of HPTN 035.

Barbra A Richardson, Cliff Kelly, Gita Ramjee, Thomas Fleming, Bonus Makanani, Sarah Roberts, Petina Musara, Nkhafwire Mkandawire, Thomas Moench, Anne Coletti and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Barbra A RichardsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA. barbrar@u.washington.edu
Cliff Kelly
Gita Ramjee
Thomas Fleming
Bonus Makanani
Sarah Roberts
Petina Musara
Nkhafwire Mkandawire
Thomas Moench
Anne Coletti
Lydia Soto-Torres
Salim A Karim
HPTN 035 Study Team
University of Washington · USCancer Research Center · USCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia · ZMCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAFamily Health International 360 · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USReProtect (United States) · USSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Zimbabwe-University of California San Francisco · ZW

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkU01AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2006 to 2010
$77.0M
HIV PREVENTION TRIALS NETWORK LEADERSHIP GROUPU01AI046749 · NIAID · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI CATES, WILLARD · 1999 to 2005
$73.5M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI046749NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U01AI068633NIAID NIH HHS U01AI46749NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the 2 control arms of HPTN 035 [a hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC) gel control arm and a no-gel control arm] to assess the behavioral effects associated with gel use and direct causal effects of the HEC gel on sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy, and genital safety.

designRandomized trial with 1 blinded (HEC gel) and 1 open-label (no-gel) control arms.

methodsHIV-uninfected, sexually active women were randomized into the HEC gel arm (n = 771) and into the no-gel arm (n = 772) in 5 countries. Participants in the HEC gel arm were instructed to insert the study gel intravaginally <1 hour before each vaginal sex act. Data on sexual behavior, adherence, safety, pregnancy, and STIs were collected quarterly for 12-30 months of follow-up.

resultsDuring follow-up, mean reported condom use in the past week was significantly higher in the no-gel arm (81% versus 70%, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences, after adjusting for this differential condom use, between the 2 arms in the rates of genital safety events, pregnancy outcomes, or STIs, including HIV-1.

conclusionsIn this large randomized trial, we found no significant differences between the no-gel and HEC gel arms in the rates of genital safety events, pregnancy outcomes, or STIs. These results aid interpretation of the results of previous vaginal microbicide trials that used the HEC gel as a control. The HEC gel is suitable as a control for ongoing and future vaginal microbicide studies.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravaginalAdultAnti-Infective AgentsCelluloseFemaleGelsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient CompliancePlacebosPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesAnti-Infective AgentsCelluloseGelshydroxyethylcellulosePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID23334506
PMCPMC3625489
OpenAlexW2032029649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.