ReviewDer Nervenarzt2013
[Mental health and work: concepts, evidence and implications for research and practice].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determinants of work ability among health and social services workers with work-related COVID-19 infection in Germany.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Job demands and resources perceived by hybrid working employees in German public administration: a qualitative study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Health Promotion for Outpatient Careworkers in Germany.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Association between time of residence and self-perception of distress, interpersonal relationships, and social role in Venezuelan immigrants in Lima, Peru 2018-19: mixed-methods study.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Workplace Health Promotion and COVID-19 Support Measures in Outpatient Care Services in Germany: A Quantitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Role of Health Literacy among Outpatient Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Health Behaviour of German Outpatient Caregivers in Relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The Health Behaviour of German Outpatient Caregivers in Relation to Their Working Conditions: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Job Demands, Resources and Strains of Outpatient Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- [Prevention and treatment of mental disorders in the workplace: staged spectrum of care].Der Nervenarzt · 2013Article
- [Association between burnout and personality: results of the Zürich study].Der Nervenarzt · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper reviews the concepts, evidence and implications regarding mental health at the workplace. The theoretical background with the most common theories (e.g. effort-reward imbalance model and job-demand control model) are briefly reviewed and findings from systematic reviews and from a meta-analysis regarding psychosocial factors at the workplace and common mental disorders, which indicate that psychosocial factors increase the risk of mental disorder are outlined. Implications for primary prevention as well as early intervention and treatment following a stepped care model including a variety of agents from different backgrounds are discussed. Implications to enhance research in the field are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23334454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.