Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23333554›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2013

Sex differences in Siberian hamster ultradian locomotor rhythms.

Brian J Prendergast, Tyler J Stevenson, Irving Zucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sex differences in daily timekeeping and circadian clock circuits.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian J PrendergastDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. prendergast@uchicago.edu
Tyler J Stevenson
Irving Zucker
University of Chicago · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Processing Photoperiod Information by the Immune SystemR01AI067406 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRENDERGAST, BRIAN J · 2005 to 2015
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in ultradian activity rhythms (URs) and circadian rhythms (CRs) were assessed in Siberian hamsters kept in long day (LD) or short day (SD) photoperiods for 40 weeks. For both sexes URs of locomotor activity were more prevalent, greater in amplitude and more robust in SDs. The UR period was longer in females than males in both day lengths. The reproductive system underwent regression and body mass declined during the initial 10 weeks of SD treatment, and in both sexes these traits spontaneously reverted to the LD phenotype at or before 40 weeks in SD, reflecting the development of neuroendocrine refractoriness to SD patterns of melatonin secretion. Hamsters of both sexes, however, continued to display SD-like URs at the 40 weeks time point. CRs were less prevalent and the waveform less robust and lower in amplitude in SDs than LDs; the SD circadian waveform also did not revert to the long-day phenotype after 40 weeks of SD treatment. Short day lengths enhanced ultradian and diminished circadian rhythms in both sexes. Day length controls several UR characteristics via gonadal steroid and melatonin-independent mechanisms. Sex differences in ultradian timing may contribute to sex diphenisms in rhythms of sleep, food intake and exercise.

Indexed as

Activity CyclesAnimalsBody WeightCircadian RhythmColorCricetinaeFemaleGenitaliaHairMaleMotor ActivityPhodopusPhotoperiodReproductionSeasonsSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID23333554
PMCPMC3985607
OpenAlexW2060002509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.