Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23333189›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of surgical research2013

Three-dimensional quantitative ultrasound for detecting lymph node metastases.

Emi Saegusa-Beecroft, Junji Machi, Jonathan Mamou, Masaki Hata, Alain Coron, Eugene T Yanagihara, Tadashi Yamaguchi, Michael L Oelze, Pascal Laugier, Ernest J Feleppa

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of surgical research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep-Learning-Driven High Spatial Resolution Attenuation Imaging for Ultrasound Tomography (AI-UT).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sensorless End-to-End Freehand 3-D Ultrasound Reconstruction With Physics-Guided Deep Learning.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emi Saegusa-BeecroftDepartment of Surgery, University of Hawaii and Kuakini Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA. esaegusa@hawaii.edu
Junji Machi
Jonathan Mamou
Masaki Hata
Alain Coron
Eugene T Yanagihara
Tadashi Yamaguchi
Michael L Oelze
Pascal Laugier
Ernest J Feleppa

Funding

Advanced Ultrasonic Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph NodesR01CA100183 · NCI · RIVERSIDE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FELEPPA, ERNEST JOSEPH · 2006 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA 100183NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetection of metastases in lymph nodes (LNs) is critical for cancer management. Conventional histological methods may miss metastatic foci. To date, no practical means of evaluating the entire LN volume exists. The aim of this study was to develop fast, reliable, operator-independent, high-frequency, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods for evaluating LNs over their entire volume to effectively detect LN metastases.

methodsWe scanned freshly excised LNs at 26 MHz and digitally acquired echo-signal data over the entire three-dimensional (3D) volume. A total of 146 LNs of colorectal, 26 LNs of gastric, and 118 LNs of breast cancer patients were enrolled. We step-sectioned LNs at 50-μm intervals and later compared them with 13 QUS estimates associated with tissue microstructure. Linear-discriminant analysis classified LNs as metastatic or nonmetastatic, and we computed areas (Az) under receiver-operator characteristic curves to assess classification performance. The QUS estimates and cancer probability values derived from discriminant analysis were depicted in 3D images for comparison with 3D histology.

resultsOf 146 LNs of colorectal cancer patients, 23 were metastatic; Az = 0.952 ± 0.021 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.911-0.993); sensitivity = 91.3% (specificity = 87.0%); and sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 67.5%). Of 26 LNs of gastric cancer patients, five were metastatic; Az = 0.962 ± 0.039 (95% CI: 0.807-1.000); sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 95.3%). A total of 17 of 118 LNs of breast cancer patients were metastatic; Az = 0.833 ± 0.047 (95% CI: 0.741-0.926); sensitivity = 88.2% (specificity = 62.5%); sensitivity = 100% (specificity = 50.5%). 3D cancer probability images showed good correlation with 3D histology.

conclusionsThese results suggest that operator- and system-independent QUS methods allow reliable entire-volume LN evaluation for detecting metastases. 3D cancer probability images can help pathologists identify metastatic foci that could be missed using conventional methods.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID23333189
PMCPMC3659175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.