Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23332975›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2013

The social phenotype of Williams syndrome.

Anna Järvinen, Julie R Korenberg, Ursula Bellugi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ophthalmic features of 218 children with Williams syndrome in china: A single-center retrospective study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Oxytocin and our place in the universe.Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Friendships in Children with Williams Syndrome: Parent and Child Perspectives.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna JärvinenLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Julie R Korenberg
Ursula Bellugi
Salk Institute for Biological Studies · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Williams Syndrome: The Molecular Genetic CharacterizationP01HD033113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BELLUGI, URSULA · 1996 to 2015
$19.4M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Williams syndrome (WS) offers an exciting model for social neuroscience because its genetic basis is well-defined, and the unique phenotype reflects dimensions of prosocial behaviors. WS is associated with a strong drive to approach strangers, a gregarious personality, heightened social engagement yet difficult peer interactions, high nonsocial anxiety, unusual bias toward positive affect, and diminished sensitivity to fear. New neurobiological evidence points toward alterations in structure, function, and connectivity of the social brain (amygdala, fusiform face area, orbital-frontal regions). Recent genetic studies implicate gene networks in the WS region with the dysregulation of prosocial neuropeptides. The study of WS has implications for understanding human social development, and may provide insight for translating genetic and neuroendocrine evidence into treatments for disorders of social behavior.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorBrainFemaleHumansMalePhenotypeWilliams Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID23332975
PMCPMC4326252
OpenAlexW2039730733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.