ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2013
Peptidomics methods for the identification of peptidase-substrate interactions.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuropeptide Characterization Workflow from Sampling to Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2025Article
- An Efficient Peptidomics Screening for Exogenous Substrates and Inhibitory Peptides of the Dipeptidase ACE from Milk Hydrolysate.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Profiling Analysis Reveals the Crucial Role of the Endogenous Peptides in Bladder Cancer Progression.OncoTargets and therapy · 2020Article
- Peptidomics Analysis Discloses That Novel Bioactive Peptides Participate in Necrotizing Enterocolitis in a Rat Model.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- [A differential peptidomics analysis of hippocampal tissue in a rat model of premature white matter injury].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019Article
- A Novel Analysis of the Peptide Terminome Characterizes Dynamics of Proteolytic Regulation in Vertebrate Skeletal Muscle Under Severe Stress.Proteomes · 2019Article
- Peptidomics and Secretomics of the Mammalian Peripheral Sensory-Motor System.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2015Article
- Peptidomics for the discovery and characterization of neuropeptides and hormones.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2015Review
- Quantitation of endogenous peptides using mass spectrometry based methods.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peptidases have important roles in controlling physiological signaling through their regulation of bioactive peptides. Understanding and controlling bioactive peptide regulation is of great biomedical interest and approaches that elucidate the interplay between peptidases and their substrates are vital for achieving this goal. Here, we highlight the utility of recent peptidomics approaches in identifying endogenous substrates of peptidases. These approaches reveal bioactive substrates and help characterize the biochemical functions of the enzyme. Most recently, peptidomics approaches have been applied to address the challenging question of identifying the peptidases responsible for regulating specific bioactive peptides. Since peptidases are of great biomedical interest, these approaches will begin to impact our ability to identify new drug targets that regulate important bioactive peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.