Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23332511›Full record

Trial reportBiological psychiatry2013

D-cycloserine enhancement of fear extinction is specific to successful exposure sessions: evidence from the treatment of height phobia.

Jasper A J Smits, David Rosenfield, Michael W Otto, Mark B Powers, Stefan G Hofmann, Michael J Telch, Mark H Pollack, Candyce D Tart

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biological psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jasper A J SmitsDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75206, USA. jsmits@smu.edu
David Rosenfield
Michael W Otto
Mark B Powers
Stefan G Hofmann
Michael J Telch
Mark H Pollack
Candyce D Tart
Southern Methodist University · USBoston University · USRaymond G. Murphy VA Medical Center · USRush University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

D-Cycloserine Enhancement of Exposure in Social PhobiaR01MH075889 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI POLLACK, MARK H · 2007 to 2010
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH075889NIMH NIH HHS R01MH075889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhereas some studies have shown clear evidence for an augmentation effect of D-cycloserine (DCS) on exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, other studies have shown weak effects or no effect at all. Some preclinical data suggest that the DCS augmentation effect is moderated by the success of extinction learning. Therefore, we conducted a reanalysis of existing data to examine whether the effects of DCS on clinical outcome would vary as a function of response to the exposure session (i.e., exposure success).

methodsIn a clinical trial, patients with height phobia received two sessions involving 30 minutes of virtual reality exposure therapy and were randomly assigned to a pill placebo (n = 14) or 50 mg of DCS (n = 15) immediately after each session.

resultsMixed-effects regression analysis showed that the effects of DCS administration on clinical improvement was moderated by the level of fear experienced just before concluding exposure sessions. Patients receiving DCS exhibited significantly greater improvement in symptoms relative to patients who received placebo when fear was low at the end of the exposure. In contrast, when end fear was still elevated, patients receiving DCS improved less compared with those receiving placebo.

conclusionsD-cycloserine appears to enhance the benefits of exposure treatment when applied after a successful session, but it seems to have detrimental effects when administered after inadequate/unsuccessful exposure sessions.

Indexed as

Phobic DisordersAdultCycloserineDouble-Blind MethodExtinction, PsychologicalFearFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleRegression AnalysisSeverity of Illness IndexVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyCycloserine

Identifiers

PMID23332511
PMCPMC3636175
OpenAlexW2072549054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.