Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23332400›Full record

ArticleTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2013

A novel assay of antimycobacterial activity and phagocytosis by human neutrophils.

David M Lowe, Nonzwakazi Bangani, Meera R Mehta, Dirk M Lang, Adriano G Rossi, Katalin A Wilkinson, Robert J Wilkinson, Adrian R Martineau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An In Vivo Model of SeparateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David M LoweDepartment of Medicine, Imperial College London, W2 1PG, UK. d.lowe@imperial.ac.uk
Nonzwakazi Bangani
Meera R Mehta
Dirk M Lang
Adriano G Rossi
Katalin A Wilkinson
Robert J Wilkinson
Adrian R Martineau

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088316Wellcome Trust WT087754Wellcome Trust WT097684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite abundant evidence that neutrophils arrive early at sites of mycobacterial disease and phagocytose organisms, techniques to assay phagocytosis or killing of mycobacteria by these cells are lacking. Existing assays for measuring the antimycobacterial activity of human leukocytes require cell lysis which introduces new bioactive substances and may be incomplete. They are also time-consuming and carry multiple risks of inaccuracy due to serial dilution and organism clumping. Flow cytometric techniques for measuring phagocytosis of mycobacteria by human cells have failed to adequately address the effects of organism clumping, quenching agents and culture conditions on readouts. Here we present a novel in-tube bioluminescence-based assay of antimycobacterial activity by human neutrophils. The assay yields intuitive results, with improving restriction of mycobacterial bioluminescence as the ratio of cells to organisms increases. We show that lysis of human cells is not required to measure luminescence accurately. We also present a phagocytosis assay in which we have minimised the impact of mycobacterial clumping, investigated the effect of various opsonisation techniques and established the correct usage of trypan blue to identify surface-bound organisms without counting dead cells. The same multiplicity of infection and serum conditions are optimal to demonstrate both internalisation and restriction of mycobacterial growth.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionFlow CytometryHumansLuminescent MeasurementsMicroscopy, ConfocalMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium tuberculosisNeutrophilsPhagocytosisTrypan BlueTuberculosisTrypan Blue

Identifiers

PMID23332400
PMCPMC3608034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.