Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23331997›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of health geographics2013

Using ArcMap, Google Earth, and Global Positioning Systems to select and locate random households in rural Haiti.

Peter J Wampler, Richard R Rediske, Azizur R Molla

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of health geographics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04419766 (Evaluation of IR3535 as a Spatial Repellent for Malaria Control.), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04419766 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of IR3535 as a Spatial Repellent for Malaria Control. (Avaliação da eficácia do Repelente Ambiental 3-(N-acetyl-n-butyl) Aminopropionic Acid Ethyl Ester (IR3535) Como Ferramenta Para o Controlo da malária).

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Nova de LisboaRan2021 to 2025Enrolled166ConditionsMalariaArmsIR3535 (3-(N-acetyl-N-butyl) aminopropionic acid ethyl ester) house spraying
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of Hand⁻Dug Wells in Rural Haiti.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter J WamplerDepartment of Geology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA. wamplerp@gvsu.edu
Richard R Rediske
Azizur R Molla

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA remote sensing technique was developed which combines a Geographic Information System (GIS); Google Earth, and Microsoft Excel to identify home locations for a random sample of households in rural Haiti. The method was used to select homes for ethnographic and water quality research in a region of rural Haiti located within 9 km of a local hospital and source of health education in Deschapelles, Haiti. The technique does not require access to governmental records or ground based surveys to collect household location data and can be performed in a rapid, cost-effective manner.

methodsThe random selection of households and the location of these households during field surveys were accomplished using GIS, Google Earth, Microsoft Excel, and handheld Garmin GPSmap 76CSx GPS units. Homes were identified and mapped in Google Earth, exported to ArcMap 10.0, and a random list of homes was generated using Microsoft Excel which was then loaded onto handheld GPS units for field location. The development and use of a remote sensing method was essential to the selection and location of random households.

resultsA total of 537 homes initially were mapped and a randomized subset of 96 was identified as potential survey locations. Over 96% of the homes mapped using Google Earth imagery were correctly identified as occupied dwellings. Only 3.6% of the occupants of mapped homes visited declined to be interviewed. 16.4% of the homes visited were not occupied at the time of the visit due to work away from the home or market days. A total of 55 households were located using this method during the 10 days of fieldwork in May and June of 2012.

conclusionsThe method used to generate and field locate random homes for surveys and water sampling was an effective means of selecting random households in a rural environment lacking geolocation infrastructure. The success rate for locating households using a handheld GPS was excellent and only rarely was local knowledge required to identify and locate households. This method provides an important technique that can be applied to other developing countries where a randomized study design is needed but infrastructure is lacking to implement more traditional participant selection methods.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsRural PopulationDeveloping CountriesGeographic Information SystemsHaitiHealth Care SurveysHumansWater Quality

Identifiers

PMID23331997
PMCPMC3576293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.