Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23330685›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2013

BioSM: metabolomics tool for identifying endogenous mammalian biochemical structures in chemical structure space.

Mai A Hamdalla, Ion I Mandoiu, Dennis W Hill, Sanguthevar Rajasekaran, David F Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Solving CASMI 2013 with MetFrag, MetFusion and MOLGEN-MS/MS.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A 'rule of 0.5' for the metabolite-likeness of approved pharmaceutical drugs.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mai A HamdallaComputer Science and Engineering Department and ‡Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, University of Connecticut , Connecticut, United States.
Ion I Mandoiu
Dennis W Hill
Sanguthevar Rajasekaran
David F Grant

Funding

Metabolomics Tools for BiomedicineR01GM087714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GRANT, DAVID FRANKLIN · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM087714NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structural identification of unknown biochemical compounds in complex biofluids continues to be a major challenge in metabolomics research. Using LC/MS, there are currently two major options for solving this problem: searching small biochemical databases, which often do not contain the unknown of interest or searching large chemical databases which include large numbers of nonbiochemical compounds. Searching larger chemical databases (larger chemical space) increases the odds of identifying an unknown biochemical compound, but only if nonbiochemical structures can be eliminated from consideration. In this paper we present BioSM; a cheminformatics tool that uses known endogenous mammalian biochemical compounds (as scaffolds) and graph matching methods to identify endogenous mammalian biochemical structures in chemical structure space. The results of a comprehensive set of empirical experiments suggest that BioSM identifies endogenous mammalian biochemical structures with high accuracy. In a leave-one-out cross validation experiment, BioSM correctly predicted 95% of 1388 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) compounds as endogenous mammalian biochemicals using 1565 scaffolds. Analysis of two additional biological data sets containing 2330 human metabolites (HMDB) and 2416 plant secondary metabolites (KEGG) resulted in biochemical annotations of 89% and 72% of the compounds, respectively. When a data set of 3895 drugs (DrugBank and USAN) was tested, 48% of these structures were predicted to be biochemical. However, when a set of synthetic chemical compounds (Chembridge and Chemsynthesis databases) were examined, only 29% of the 458,207 structures were predicted to be biochemical. Moreover, BioSM predicted that 34% of 883,199 randomly selected compounds from PubChem were biochemical. We then expanded the scaffold list to 3927 biochemical compounds and reevaluated the above data sets to determine whether scaffold number influenced model performance. Although there were significant improvements in model sensitivity and specificity using the larger scaffold list, the data set comparison results were very similar. These results suggest that additional biochemical scaffolds will not further improve our representation of biochemical structure space and that the model is reasonably robust. BioSM provides a qualitative (yes/no) and quantitative (ranking) method for endogenous mammalian biochemical annotation of chemical space and, thus, will be useful in the identification of unknown biochemical structures in metabolomics. BioSM is freely available at http://metabolomics.pharm.uconn.edu.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBody FluidsCytochromesDatabases, ProteinHumansMammalsMetabolomicsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularReproducibility of ResultsSmall Molecule LibrariesCytochromesSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID23330685
PMCPMC3866231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.