ArticlePLoS currents2013
Guidance in social and ethical issues related to clinical, diagnostic care and novel therapies for hereditary neuromuscular rare diseases: "translating" the translational.
Article in PLoS currents, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.Journal of general internal medicine · 2014Pooled it
- A conceptual model and practical guidance for the development, administration, and evaluation of individualized therapies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Rare disease clinical trials in the European Union: navigating regulatory and clinical challenges.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Together4RD position statement on collaboration between European reference networks and industry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2023Article
- Literature Review on Health Emigration in Rare Diseases-A Machine Learning Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Decoding Neuromuscular Disorders Using Phenotypic Clusters Obtained From Co-Occurrence Networks.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Ethical Questions Linked to Rare Diseases and Orphan Drugs - A Systematic Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020Article
- Exploring patient and family involvement in the lifecycle of an orphan drug: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2017Article
- 'You should at least ask'. The expectations, hopes and fears of rare disease patients on large-scale data and biomaterial sharing for genomics research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Looking Forward to New Therapies: A Personal Perspective on the Translational Landscape for Muscular Dystrophies.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2015Article
- The TREAT-NMD advisory committee for therapeutics (TACT): an innovative de-risking model to foster orphan drug development.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug trials in children engage with many ethical issues, from drug-related safety concerns to communication with patients and parents, and recruitment and informed consent procedures. This paper addresses the field of neuromuscular disorders where the possibility of genetic, mutation-specific treatments, has added new complexity. Not only must trial design address issues of equity of access, but researchers must also think through the implications of adopting a personalised medicine approach, which requires a precise molecular diagnosis, in addition to other implications of developing orphan drugs. It is against this background of change and complexity that the Project Ethics Council (PEC) was established within the TREAT-NMD EU Network of Excellence. The PEC is a high level advisory group that draws upon the expertise of its interdisciplinary membership which includes clinicians, lawyers, scientists, parents, representatives of patient organisations, social scientists and ethicists. In this paper we describe the establishment and terms of reference of the PEC, give an indication of the range and depth of its work and provide some analysis of the kinds of complex questions encountered. The paper describes how the PEC has responded to substantive ethical issues raised within the TREAT-NMD consortium and how it has provided a wider resource for any concerned parent, patient, or clinician to ask a question of ethical concern. Issues raised range from science related ethical issues, issues related to hereditary neuromuscular diseases and the new therapeutic approaches and questions concerning patients rights in the context of patient registries and bio-banks. We conclude by recommending the PEC as a model for similar research contexts in rare diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.