Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23329637›Full record

ReviewSeminars in reproductive medicine2013

Human trophoblast progenitors: where do they reside?

Olga Genbacev, Julie D Lamb, Akraporn Prakobphol, Matt Donne, Michael T McMaster, Susan J Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem cell models of human embryo implantation and trophoblast invasion.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  2. Super-Enhancers in Placental Development and Diseases.Journal of developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga GenbacevEly and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Center for Reproductive Sciences, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California-San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Julie D Lamb
Akraporn Prakobphol
Matt Donne
Michael T McMaster
Susan J Fisher
Reproductive Science Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USBroad Center · US

Funding

TROPHOBLAST PRODUCTS IN GENESIS OF PREECLAMPSIAP01HD030367 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HUBEL, CARL A · 1993 to 2012
$17.2M
Project 4: Human Endometrial Programming for Successful ImplantationP50HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIUDICE, LINDA C · 2014 to 2022
$16.4M
Trophoblast Differentiation in In Vivo and In Vitro Fertilized EmbryosU54HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI TRAN, NAM D · 2007 to 2013
$11.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD030367NICHD NIH HHS HD055764NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD030367NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055764NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD055764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, very little is known about the factors that regulate trophoblast (TB) specification, expansion of the initial TB population, and formation of the cytotrophoblast (CTB) populations that populate the chorionic villi. The absence of human trophoblast progenitor cell (hTPC) lines that can be propagated in vitro has been a limiting factor. Because attempts to derive TB stem cells from the trophectoderm of the human blastocyst have so far failed, investigators use alternative systems as cell culture models including TBs derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), immortalized CTBs, and cell lines established from TB tumors. Additionally, the characteristics of mature TBs have been extensively studied using primary cultures of CTBs and explants of placental chorionic villi. However, none of these models can be used to study TB progenitor self-renewal and differentiation. Furthermore, the propagation of human TB progenitors from villous CTBs (vCTBs) has not been achieved. The downregulation of key markers of cell cycle progression in vCTBs by the end of the first trimester of pregnancy may indicate that these cells are not a source of human TB progenitors later in pregnancy. In contrast, mesenchymal cells of the villi and chorion continue to proliferate until the end of pregnancy. We recently reported isolation of continuously self-renewing hTPCs from chorionic mesenchyme and showed that they differentiated into the mature TB cell types of the villi, evidence that they can function as TB progenitors. This new cell culture model enables a molecular analysis of the seminal steps in human TB differentiation that have yet to be studied in humans. In turn, this information can be used to trace the origins of pregnancy complications that are associated with faulty TB growth and differentiation.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell CycleChorionic VilliFemaleHumansPregnancyStem CellsTrophoblasts

Identifiers

PMID23329637
PMCPMC6101668
OpenAlexW2061561161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.