ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2013
Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and Validity of Laboratory and Field Cardiorespiratory Exercise Tests for Wheelchair Users: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Effects of modified multistage field test on performance and physiological responses in wheelchair basketball players.BioMed research international · 2015Trial
- The infinity test: a novel 3-minute all-out wheelchair field test for estimating VO₂peak in individuals with paraplegia.Spinal cord · 2026Article
- Determination of cut-off points for the Move4 accelerometer and assessment of energy expenditure in children and adolescents aged 6-16 years using manual wheelchairs: a validation and calibration study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Agreement-Based Validation of ISOMETRO for Upper-Limb Isometric Tension Measurements.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multidimensional field-based performance profiling in the Latvian national wheelchair basketball team: an exploratory study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Assessment of asymmetry and trajectory during repeated twenty-meter sprints in court sports wheelchair athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Trying to use temporal and kinematic parameters for the classification in wheelchair badminton.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing Inclusivity in Sports: A Focus on Adaptive Synergy for Athletes with Physical Disabilities.International journal of exercise science · 2025Article
- Development of Field Tests for Cardiovascular Fitness Assessment in Wheelchair.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validity of a Wheelchair Rugby Field Test to Simulate Physiological and Thermoregulatory Match Outcomes.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effects of trunk muscle activation on trunk stability, arm power, blood pressure and performance in wheelchair rugby players with a spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2022Article
- Prediction of Propulsion Kinematics and Performance in Wheelchair Rugby.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Back Problems: Pros and Cons of Core Strengthening Exercises as a Part of Athlete Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Personalized Tests in Paralympic Athletes: Aerobic and Anaerobic Performance Profile of Elite Wheelchair Rugby Players.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Understanding the Development of Elite Parasport Athletes Using a Constraint-Led Approach: Considerations for Coaches and Practitioners.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- Comparison of Aerobic Performance Testing Protocols in Elite Male Wheelchair Basketball Players.Journal of human kinetics · 2017Article
- Wheelchair Shuttle Test for Assessing Aerobic Fitness in Youth With Spina Bifida: Validity and Reliability.Physical therapy · 2017Article
- Physiological responses between players with and without spinal cord injury in wheelchair basketball small-sided games.Spinal cord · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The volume of literature on field-based physiological testing of wheelchair sports, such as basketball, rugby and tennis, is considerably smaller when compared with that available for individuals and team athletes in able-bodied (AB) sports. In analogy to the AB literature, it is recognized that performance in wheelchair sports not only relies on fitness, but also sport-specific skills, experience and technical proficiency. However, in contrast to AB sports, two major components contribute towards 'wheeled sports' performance, which are the athlete and the wheelchair. It is the interaction of these two that enable wheelchair propulsion and the sporting movements required within a given sport. Like any other athlete, participants of wheelchair sports are looking for efficient ways to train and/or analyse their technique and fitness to improve their performance. Consequently, laboratory and/or field-based physiological monitoring tools used at regular intervals at key time points throughout the year must be considered to help with training evaluation. The present review examines methods available in the literature to assess wheelchair sports fitness in a field-based environment, with special attention on outcome variables, validity and reliability issues, and non-physiological influences on performance. It also lays out the context of field-based testing by providing details about the Paralympic court sports and the impacts of a disability on sporting performance. Due to the limited availability of specialized equipment for testing wheelchair-dependent participants in the laboratory, the adoption of field-based testing has become the preferred option by team coaches of wheelchair athletes. An obvious advantage of field-based testing is that large groups of athletes can be tested in less time. Furthermore, athletes are tested in their natural environment (using their normal sports wheelchair set-up and floor surface), potentially making the results of such testing more relevant than laboratory testing. However, given that many tests, such as the multistage fitness test and the Yo-Yo intermittent test, have originally been developed for AB games players, the assumption that these can also be used for wheelchair athletes may be erroneous. With the array of AB aerobic and anaerobic field tests available, it is difficult to ascertain which ones may be best suited for wheelchair athletes. Therefore, new, wheelchair sport-specific tests have been proposed and validated. Careful selection of tests to enable coaches to distinguish between disability classifications, wheelchair proficiency and actual performance improvements is paramount as this will not only enhance the value of field-based testing, but also help with the development of meaningful normative data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.