Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23329591›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics2013

A systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information in academia and practice.

Lotte Steuten, Gijs van de Wetering, Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Valesca Retèl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Accurate EVSI Estimation for Nonlinear Models Using the Gaussian Approximation Method.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A Review of Web-Based Tools for Value-of-Information Analysis.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021
    Review
  7. Value of Information Analysis: Are We There Yet?PharmacoEconomics - open · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from 3 Case Studies.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Gaussian Approximation Approach for Value of Information Analysis.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lotte SteutenDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. l.m.g.steuten@utwente.nl
Gijs van de Wetering
Karin Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Valesca Retèl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis article provides a systematic and critical review of the evolving methods and applications of value of information (VOI) in academia and practice and discusses where future research needs to be directed.

methodsPublished VOI studies were identified by conducting a computerized search on Scopus and ISI Web of Science from 1980 until December 2011 using pre-specified search terms. Only full-text papers that outlined and discussed VOI methods for medical decision making, and studies that applied VOI and explicitly discussed the results with a view to informing healthcare decision makers, were included. The included papers were divided into methodological and applied papers, based on the aim of the study.

resultsA total of 118 papers were included of which 50 % (n = 59) are methodological. A rapidly accumulating literature base on VOI from 1999 onwards for methodological papers and from 2005 onwards for applied papers is observed. Expected value of sample information (EVSI) is the preferred method of VOI to inform decision making regarding specific future studies, but real-life applications of EVSI remain scarce. Methodological challenges to VOI are numerous and include the high computational demands, dealing with non-linear models and interdependency between parameters, estimations of effective time horizons and patient populations, and structural uncertainties.

conclusionVOI analysis receives increasing attention in both the methodological and the applied literature bases, but challenges to applying VOI in real-life decision making remain. For many technical and methodological challenges to VOI analytic solutions have been proposed in the literature, including leaner methods for VOI. Further research should also focus on the needs of decision makers regarding VOI.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalDecision MakingCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.