Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23329466›Full record

ReviewDrugs2013

Ranolazine: a review of its use as add-on therapy in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Gillian M Keating

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost-utility of ranolazine for the symptomatic treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris in Spain.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The potential contribution of ranolazine to Torsade de Pointe.Journal of cardiovascular disease research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gillian M KeatingAdis, Mairangi Bay, North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand. DRU@adis.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended-release ranolazine (ranolazine ER) [Ranexa(®)] is an antianginal agent that achieves its effects via a novel mechanism of action (inhibition of the late phase of the inward sodium current), without affecting heart rate or blood pressure (BP). This article reviews the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ranolazine ER as add-on therapy in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties and its use in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. In the CARISA and ERICA trials, add-on therapy with ranolazine ER improved exercise tolerance and/or reduced angina frequency and nitroglycerin use in patients with chronic stable angina; benefits were seen across a variety of patient subgroups. Although results of the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial do not support the use of ranolazine ER in the acute management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, they do support its use as an antianginal therapy. Ranolazine ER was generally well tolerated, with the most commonly reported adverse events including dizziness, nausea, asthenia and constipation. Despite being associated with modest increases in the corrected QT interval, ranolazine ER demonstrated antiarrhythmic effects in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial. In conclusion, ranolazine ER provides an important option for use as add-on therapy to reduce symptoms in patients with chronic stable angina.

Indexed as

AcetanilidesAngina, StableDose-Response Relationship, DrugEnzyme InhibitorsHumansPiperazinesRanolazineTreatment OutcomeAcetanilidesEnzyme InhibitorsPiperazinesRanolazine

Identifiers

PMID23329466
OpenAlexW2074889711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.