Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23329391›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2013

Peakmatch: a simple and robust method for peak list matching.

Lena Buchner, Elena Schmidt, Peter Güntert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lena BuchnerInstitute of Biophysical Chemistry, Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, and Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elena Schmidt
Peter Güntert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peak lists are commonly used in NMR as input data for various software tools such as automatic assignment and structure calculation programs. Inconsistencies of chemical shift referencing among different peak lists or between peak and chemical shift lists can cause severe problems during peak assignment. Here we present a simple and robust tool to achieve self-consistency of the chemical shift referencing among a set of peak lists. The Peakmatch algorithm matches a set of peak lists to a specified reference peak list, neither of which have to be assigned. The chemical shift referencing offset between two peak lists is determined by optimizing an assignment-free match score function using either a complete grid search or downhill simplex optimization. It is shown that peak lists from many different types of spectra can be matched reliably as long as they contain at least two corresponding dimensions. Using a simulated peak list, the Peakmatch algorithm can also be used to obtain the optimal agreement between a chemical shift list and experimental peak lists. Combining these features makes Peakmatch a useful tool that can be applied routinely before automatic assignment or structure calculation in order to obtain an optimized input data set.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.