Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23329234›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

Prognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort.

G Fisher, Z H Yang, S Kudahetti, H Møller, P Scardino, J Cuzick, D M Berney, Transatlantic Prostate Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03912883 (Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer for Patients Treated by Watchful Waiting), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03912883 active not recruitingnot on this map

Prognostic Factors in Prostate Cancer for Patients Treated by Watchful Waiting

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen Mary University of LondonRan1999 to 2030Enrolled3,350ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The role of the histone H3 variant CENPA in prostate cancer.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

G FisherCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Z H Yang
S Kudahetti
H Møller
P Scardino
J Cuzick
D M Berney
Transatlantic Prostate Group

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Cancer Research UKNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandard clinical parameters cannot accurately differentiate indolent from aggressive prostate cancer. Our previous work showed that immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki-67 improved prediction of prostate cancer death in a cohort of conservatively treated clinically localised prostate cancers diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Here, we present results in a more clinically relevant needle biopsy cohort.

methodsBiopsy specimens were microarrayed. The percentage of Ki-67 positively stained malignant cells per core was measured and the maximum score per individual used in analysis of time to death from prostate cancer using a Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsIn univariate analysis (n=293), the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence intervals) for dichotomous Ki-67 (≤ 10%, >10%) was 3.42 (1.76, 6.62) χ(2) (1 df)=9.8, P=0.002. In multivariate analysis, Ki-67 added significant predictive information to that provided by Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (HR=2.78 (1.42, 5.46), χ(2) (1 df)=7.0, P=0.008).

conclusionThe IHC Ki-67 scoring on prostate needle biopsies is practicable and yielded significant prognostic information. It was less informative than in the previous TURP cohort where tumour samples were larger and more comprehensive, but in more contemporary cohorts with larger numbers of biopsies per patient, Ki-67 may prove a more powerful biomarker.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, NeedleCell ProliferationCohort StudiesHumansKi-67 AntigenMaleNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23329234
PMCPMC3566811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.