Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23328956›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2013

Differences among health care settings in utilization and type of physical rehabilitation administered to patients receiving workers' compensation for musculoskeletal disorders.

Paul F Beattie, Roger M Nelson, Kevin Basile

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul F BeattieArnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. pbeattie@mailbox.sc.edu
Roger M Nelson
Kevin Basile
Department of Health Services · USLebanon Valley College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a paucity of data describing the relationship between practice setting and the delivery of physical rehabilitation to injured workers. PURPOSE: To determine differences in the number of visits, the number of treatment units, and the proportion of billing for physical agents over an episode of care between different practice settings' providing physical rehabilitation to patients receiving workers' compensation for a musculoskeletal problem.

methodsA large administrative database was evaluated retrospectively. Practice settings were classified as physician office, corporate physical therapy clinic, occupational medicine clinic, hospital-based outpatient clinic, or private physical therapy practice.

results70,306 subjects (72.7 % male; mean age = 44.6, SD = 11.8 years) were included in this study. Corporate physical therapy clinics had the highest mean values for total visits (13.1, SD = 12.7) and for total units (66.8, SD = 85.5), and the lowest mean values for proportion of physical agents during the episode of care (.22, SD = .18). Occupational medicine clinics had the lowest mean values for total visits (6.8, SD = 7.9) and for total units (30.4, SD = 36.5), and the highest mean value for proportion of physical agents during the episode of care (.41, SD = .22). When controlling for ICD-9-CM codes, body-part treated, surgical status, and geographical region there were small changes in effect size; however, the significance and directionality of differences between practice settings were not changed.

conclusionsThere were significant differences in billing for physical rehabilitation services between practice settings for patients receiving workers' compensation. Corporate physical therapy clinics billed for more total visits and total units over an episode of care than did other practice settings; however they also billed for a lower proportion of physical agents indicating a greater use of those interventions supported by evidence-based guidelines (exercise and manual therapy) compared to other practice settings.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID23328956
PMCPMC3734600
OpenAlexW2006099514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.