Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23328813›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2013

NABTT 0502: a phase II and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib and sorafenib for patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

David M Peereboom, Manmeet S Ahluwalia, Xiaobu Ye, Jeffrey G Supko, Sarah L Hilderbrand, Surasak Phuphanich, L Burt Nabors, Myrna R Rosenfeld, Tom Mikkelsen, Stuart A Grossman and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00445588 (A Phase II Trial of Erlotinib), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00445588 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Trial of Erlotinib (OSI-774) and Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) for Patients With Progression or Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2007 to 2009Enrolled56ConditionsAdult Giant Cell Glioblastoma, Adult Glioblastoma, Adult Gliosarcoma, Recurrent Adult Brain TumorArmserlotinib hydrochloride, sorafenib tosylate, pharmacological study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Kinase-Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

David M PeereboomCleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. peerebd@ccf.org
Manmeet S Ahluwalia
Xiaobu Ye
Jeffrey G Supko
Sarah L Hilderbrand
Surasak Phuphanich
L Burt Nabors
Myrna R Rosenfeld
Tom Mikkelsen
Stuart A Grossman
New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy Consortium
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USCleveland Clinic · USJohns Hopkins University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

NEW APPROACHES TO BRAIN TUMOR THERAPY CNS CONSORTIUMU01CA062475 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSMAN, STUART A · 1994 to 2008
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA-62475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe signal transduction pathways of epidermal growth factor receptor and Ras are both important in the growth of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We hypothesized that inhibition of both pathways would improve the survival time of patients with recurrent GBM.

methodsPatients with recurrent/progressive GBM with 0-2 prior chemotherapy regimens received erlotinib 150 mg once daily and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily until progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed during cycle 1.

resultsThe median overall survival was 5.7 months. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 14%. Toxicity was manageable. Clearance of erlotinib was markedly enhanced by sorafenib.

conclusionThe study did not meet its objective of a 30% increase in overall survival time compared with historical controls. Erlotinib and sorafenib have significant pharmacokinetic interactions that may negatively impact the efficacy of the combination regimen.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsErlotinib HydrochlorideNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsQuinazolinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID23328813
PMCPMC3607264
OpenAlexW2128546510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.