Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23327643›Full record

Trial reportSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2013

Impact of a board-game approach on current smokers: a randomized controlled trial.

Yasser Khazaal, Anne Chatton, Roberto Prezzemolo, Fadi Zebouni, Yves Edel, Johan Jacquet, Ornella Ruggeri, Emilie Burnens, Grégoire Monney, Anne-Sylvie Protti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Serious games for smoking prevention and cessation: A systematic review of game elements and game effects.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yasser KhazaalDivision of Addictology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Verte 2, Geneva 1205, Switzerland. yasser.khazaal@hcuge.ch
Anne Chatton
Roberto Prezzemolo
Fadi Zebouni
Yves Edel
Johan Jacquet
Ornella Ruggeri
Emilie Burnens
Grégoire Monney
Anne-Sylvie Protti
Jean-François Etter
Riaz Khan
Jacques Cornuz
Daniele Zullino
University Hospital of Geneva · CHPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of our study was to assess the impact of a board game on smoking status and smoking-related variables in current smokers. To accomplish this objective, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the game group with a psychoeducation group and a waiting-list control group.

methodsThe following measures were performed at participant inclusion, as well as after a 2-week and a 3-month follow-up period: "Attitudes Towards Smoking Scale" (ATS-18), "Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire" (SEQ-12), "Attitudes Towards Nicotine Replacement Therapy" scale (ANRT-12), number of cigarettes smoked per day, stages of change, quit attempts, and smoking status. Furthermore, participants were assessed for concurrent psychiatric disorders and for the severity of nicotine dependence with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND).

resultsA time × group effect was observed for subscales of the ANRT-12, ATS-18 and SEQ-12, as well as for the number of cigarettes smoked per day. At three months follow-up, compared to the participants allocated to the waiting list group, those on Pick-Klop group were less likely to remain smoker.Outcomes at 3 months were not predicted by gender, age, FTND, stage of change, or psychiatric disorders at inclusion.

conclusionsThe board game seems to be a good option for smokers. The game led to improvements in variables known to predict quitting in smokers. Furthermore, it increased smoking-cessation rates at 3-months follow-up. The game is also an interesting alternative for smokers in the precontemplation stage.

Indexed as

Games, ExperimentalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsPersonal SatisfactionPsychotherapy, GroupSmokingSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID23327643
PMCPMC3564767
OpenAlexW2141055998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.