Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23327632›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2013

Comparison of outcomes for veterans receiving dialysis care from VA and non-VA providers.

Virginia Wang, Matthew L Maciejewski, Uptal D Patel, Karen M Stechuchak, Denise M Hynes, Morris Weinberger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Survival among Veterans Obtaining Dialysis in VA and Non-VA Settings.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia WangHealth Services Research and Development, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. virginia.wang@duke.edu
Matthew L Maciejewski
Uptal D Patel
Karen M Stechuchak
Denise M Hynes
Morris Weinberger
Duke University · USHealth Services Research & Development · USDurham VA Medical Center · USIllinois College · US

Funding

Duke Mentored CER Scholar ProgramK12HS019479 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ODDONE, EUGENE Z. · 2010 to 2010
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS019479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemand for dialysis treatment exceeds its supply within the Veterans Health Administration (VA), requiring VA to outsource dialysis care by purchasing private sector dialysis for veterans on a fee-for-service basis. It is unclear whether outcomes are similar for veterans receiving dialysis from VA versus non-VA providers. We assessed the extent of chronic dialysis treatment utilization and differences in all-cause hospitalizations and mortality between veterans receiving dialysis from VA versus VA-outsourced providers.

methodsWe constructed a retrospective cohort of veterans in 2 VA regions who received chronic dialysis treatment financed by VA between January 2007 and December 2008. From VA administrative data, we identified veterans who received outpatient dialysis in (1) VA, (2) VA-outsourced settings, or (3) both ("dual") settings. In adjusted analyses, we used two-part and logistic regression to examine associations between dialysis setting and all-cause hospitalization and mortality one-year from veterans' baseline dialysis date.

resultsOf 1,388 veterans, 27% received dialysis exclusively in VA, 47% in VA-outsourced settings, and 25% in dual settings. Overall, half (48%) were hospitalized and 12% died. In adjusted analysis, veterans in VA-outsourced settings incurred fewer hospitalizations and shorter hospital stays than users of VA due to favorable selection. Dual-system dialysis patients had lower one-year mortality than veterans receiving VA dialysis.

conclusionsVA expenditures for "buying" outsourced dialysis are high and increasing relative to "making" dialysis treatment within its own system. Outcomes comparisons inform future make-or-buy decisions and suggest the need for VA to consider veterans' access to care, long-term VA savings, and optimal patient outcomes in its placement decisions for dialysis services.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareRenal DialysisUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransAgedFemaleHealth FacilitiesHospitalizationHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23327632
PMCPMC3559268
OpenAlexW1997163526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.