Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326543›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Combined effects of ventilation mode and positive end-expiratory pressure on mechanics, gas exchange and the epithelium in mice with acute lung injury.

Apiradee Thammanomai, Hiroshi Hamakawa, Erzsébet Bartolák-Suki, Béla Suki

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07791225 (A Bayesian, Operationally Seamless Adaptive Phase 2A/2B, Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized, Two-part Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Optimal Tidal Volume Distribution of Variable Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07791225 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

A Bayesian, Operationally Seamless Adaptive Phase 2A/2B, Open-label, Multi-center, Randomized, Two-part Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Optimal Tidal Volume Distribution of Variable Ventilation (VV) in Participants Undergoing Mechanical Ventilatory Support for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2027 to 2031Enrolled20ConditionsARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)ArmsVariable Ventilation, Conventional Ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Species-specific effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on diaphragm and chest wall geometry in mice, rats, and humans.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Airway smooth muscle adapting in dynamic conditions is refractory to the bronchodilator effect of a deep inspiration.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Regional distribution of transpulmonary pressure.Annals of translational medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Apiradee ThammanomaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hiroshi Hamakawa
Erzsébet Bartolák-Suki
Béla Suki
Boston University · US

Funding

Regulatory roles of variable mechanical stimuli in cell functionR01HL098976 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SUKI, BELA · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-098976NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accepted protocol to ventilate patients with acute lung injury is to use low tidal volume (V(T)) in combination with recruitment maneuvers or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, an important aspect of mechanical ventilation has not been considered: the combined effects of PEEP and ventilation modes on the integrity of the epithelium. Additionally, it is implicitly assumed that the best PEEP-V(T) combination also protects the epithelium. We aimed to investigate the effects of ventilation mode and PEEP on respiratory mechanics, peak airway pressures and gas exchange as well as on lung surfactant and epithelial cell integrity in mice with acute lung injury. HCl-injured mice were ventilated at PEEPs of 3 and 6 cmH(2)O with conventional ventilation (CV), CV with intermittent large breaths (CV(LB)) to promote recruitment, and a new mode, variable ventilation, optimized for mice (VV(N)). Mechanics and gas exchange were measured during ventilation and surfactant protein (SP)-B, proSP-B and E-cadherin levels were determined from lavage and lung homogenate. PEEP had a significant effect on mechanics, gas exchange and the epithelium. The higher PEEP reduced lung collapse and improved mechanics and gas exchange but it also down regulated surfactant release and production and increased epithelial cell injury. While CV(LB) was better than CV, VV(N) outperformed CV(LB) in recruitment, reduced epithelial injury and, via a dynamic mechanotransduction, it also triggered increased release and production of surfactant. For long-term outcome, selection of optimal PEEP and ventilation mode may be based on balancing lung physiology with epithelial injury.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary AlveoliRespiration, ArtificialAcute Lung InjuryAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCadherinsEpitheliumHumansHydrochloric AcidMicePulmonary Gas ExchangePulmonary SurfactantsTidal VolumeCadherinsHydrochloric AcidPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID23326543
PMCPMC3541132
OpenAlexW2171623786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.