Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326429›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Rescue of inhibitory synapse strength following developmental hearing loss.

Vibhakar C Kotak, Anne E Takesian, Patricia C MacKenzie, Dan H Sanes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developmental hearing loss-induced perceptual deficits are rescued by genetic restoration of cortical inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Development of Auditory Cortex Circuits.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Developmental studies in fragile X syndrome.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2020
    Review
  11. Preserving Inhibition during Developmental Hearing Loss Rescues Auditory Learning and Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vibhakar C KotakCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America. vck1@nyu.edu
Anne E Takesian
Patricia C MacKenzie
Dan H Sanes
New York University · US

Funding

Rescue of cortical inhibitory synapses following developmental hearing lossR01DC011284 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, DAN HARVEY · 2011 to 2022
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC011284NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitory synapse dysfunction may contribute to many developmental brain disorders, including the secondary consequences of sensory deprivation. In fact, developmental hearing loss leads to a profound reduction in the strength of inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) in the auditory cortex, and this deficit persists into adulthood. This finding is consistent with the general theory that the emergence of mature synaptic properties requires activity during development. Therefore, we tested the prediction that inhibitory strength can be restored following developmental hearing loss by boosting GABAergic transmission in vivo. Conductive or sensorineural hearing loss was induced surgically in gerbils prior to hearing onset and GABA agonists were then administered for one week. IPSCs were subsequently recorded from pyramidal neurons in a thalamocortical brain slice preparation. Administration of either a GABA(A) receptor a1 subunit specific agonist (zolpidem), or a selective GABA reuptake inhibitor (SGRI), rescued IPSC amplitude in hearing loss animals. Furthermore, this restoration persisted in adults, long after drug treatment ended. In contrast, a GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen did not restore inhibitory strength. IPSCs could also be restored when SGRI administration began 3 weeks after sensory deprivation. Together, these results demonstrate long-lasting restoration of cortical inhibitory strength in the absence of normal experience. This suggests that in vivo GABA(A) receptor activation is sufficient to promote maturation, and this principle may extend to other developmental disorders associated with diminished inhibitory function.

Indexed as

Neural InhibitionAnimalsBaclofenCochleaGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA Uptake InhibitorsGerbillinaeHearing LossInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsPyridinesReceptors, GABA-ASynapsesZolpidemBaclofenGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABA Uptake InhibitorsPyridinesReceptors, GABA-AZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID23326429
PMCPMC3543446
OpenAlexW1968181078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.