SynthesisPloS one2013
Primary prevention of cannabis use: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health education interventions to reduce cannabis and tobacco smoking-related harms among people who use cannabis: a systematic review.Health education research · 2026Pooled it
- A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Interactive Middle School Cannabis Prevention Programs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2017Pooled it
- Technology-based interventions for tobacco and other drug use in university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2015Pooled it
- Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcome Responsiveness of the Joint Effort Mobile App for Promoting Lower-Risk Cannabis Use Among Young Adults: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Universal cannabis outcomes from the Climate and Preventure (CAP) study: a cluster randomised controlled trial.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2018Trial
- The role of perceived access to cannabis in the association between friends who use cannabis and adolescent initiation: A longitudinal analysis from the Canadian COMPASS study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Observational
- Alerta Cannabis: A Tailored-Computer Web-Based Program for the Prevention of Cannabis Use in Adolescents: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Cannabis Use and Its Impact on Mental Health in Youth in Australia and the United States: A Scoping Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Attitudes to Cannabis Use and Public Prevention Information Among Young Adults: A Qualitative Interview Study With Implications for Prevention Practice.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021Review
- Commentary on Chan & Hall (2020): Advances in specifying cannabis consumption.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020Article
- Time since first cannabis use and 12-month prevalence of cannabis use disorder among youth and emerging adults in the United States.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2019Article
- Development and psychometric properties of the methamphetamine decisional balance scale (METH-DBS) for young adults.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2018Article
- Early interventions in risk groups for schizophrenia: what are we waiting for?NPJ schizophrenia · 2016Review
- Development of a brief substance use sensation seeking scale: validation and prediction of injection-related behaviors.AIDS and behavior · 2015Article
- Time Trends of Cannabis Use Among Treatment-seeking Individuals at Government De-addiction Centers Across India Over a Period of 7 Years.Indian journal of psychological medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A systematic review of primary prevention was conducted for cannabis use outcomes in youth and young adults. The aim of the review was to develop a comprehensive understanding of prevention programming by assessing universal, targeted, uni-modal, and multi-modal approaches as well as individual program characteristics. Twenty-eight articles, representing 25 unique studies, identified from eight electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycINFO, DRUG, EBM Reviews, and Project CORK), were eligible for inclusion. Results indicated that primary prevention programs can be effective in reducing cannabis use in youth populations, with statistically significant effect sizes ranging from trivial (0.07) to extremely large (5.26), with the majority of significant effect sizes being trivial to small. Given that the preponderance of significant effect sizes were trivial to small and that percentages of statistically significant and non-statistically significant findings were often equivalent across program type and individual components, the effectiveness of primary prevention for cannabis use should be interpreted with caution. Universal multi-modal programs appeared to outperform other program types (i.e, universal uni-modal, targeted multi-modal, targeted unimodal). Specifically, universal multi-modal programs that targeted early adolescents (10-13 year olds), utilised non-teacher or multiple facilitators, were short in duration (10 sessions or less), and implemented boosters sessions were associated with large median effect sizes. While there were studies in these areas that contradicted these results, the results highlight the importance of assessing the interdependent relationship of program components and program types. Finally, results indicated that the overall quality of included studies was poor, with an average quality rating of 4.64 out of 9. Thus, further quality research and reporting and the development of new innovative programs are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.