Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326394›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Psychoacoustic tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress show different associations with oscillatory brain activity.

Tobias Balkenhol, Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke, Wolfgang Delb

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03550430 (Study Protocol for a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Assessing the Specificity of an Alpha/Delta Ratio Neurofeedback Training Protocol in Chronic Tinnitus.), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03550430 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Study Protocol for a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial, Assessing the Specificity of an Alpha/Delta Ratio Neurofeedback Training Protocol in Chronic Tinnitus.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2018 to 2020Enrolled90ConditionsTinnitus, Subjective Tinnitus, Chronic TinnitusArmsalpha/delta neurofeedback, beta/theta neurofeedback, Diary completion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Reducing Tinnitus via Inhibitory Influence of the Sensorimotor System on Auditory Cortical Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tinnitus, sound intolerance, and mental health: the role of long-term occupational noise exposure.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Psychoacoustic classification of persistent tinnitus.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias BalkenholDepartment of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke
Wolfgang Delb

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe phantom auditory perception of subjective tinnitus is associated with aberrant brain activity as evidenced by magneto- and electroencephalographic studies. We tested the hypotheses (1) that psychoacoustically measured tinnitus loudness is related to gamma oscillatory band power, and (2) that tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related distress are related to distinct brain activity patterns as suggested by the distinction between loudness and distress experienced by tinnitus patients. Furthermore, we explored (3) how hearing impairment, minimum masking level, and (4) psychological comorbidities are related to spontaneous oscillatory brain activity in tinnitus patients. METHODS AND

findingsResting state oscillatory brain activity recorded electroencephalographically from 46 male tinnitus patients showed a positive correlation between gamma band oscillations and psychoacoustic tinnitus loudness determined with the reconstructed tinnitus sound, but not with the other psychoacoustic loudness measures that were used. Tinnitus-related distress did also correlate with delta band activity, but at electrode positions different from those associated with tinnitus loudness. Furthermore, highly distressed tinnitus patients exhibited a higher level of theta band activity. Moreover, mean hearing loss between 0.125 kHz and 16 kHz was associated with a decrease in gamma activity, whereas minimum masking levels correlated positively with delta band power. In contrast, psychological comorbidities did not express significant correlations with oscillatory brain activity.

conclusionDifferent clinically relevant tinnitus characteristics show distinctive associations with spontaneous brain oscillatory power. Results support hypothesis (1), but exclusively for the tinnitus loudness derived from matching to the reconstructed tinnitus sound. This suggests to preferably use the reconstructed tinnitus spectrum to determine psychoacoustic tinnitus loudness. Results also support hypothesis (2). Moreover, hearing loss and minimum masking level correlate with oscillatory power in distinctive frequency bands. The lack of an association between psychological comorbidities and oscillatory power may be attributed to the overall low level of mental health problems in the present sample.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAuditory PerceptionBrainElectroencephalographyHearing LossHumansLoudness PerceptionMagnetoencephalographyMaleMiddle AgedPerceptual MaskingPsychoacousticsTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID23326394
PMCPMC3542397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.