Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326356›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Ginkgo biloba extract and long-term cognitive decline: a 20-year follow-up population-based study.

Hélène Amieva, Céline Meillon, Catherine Helmer, Pascale Barberger-Gateau, Jean François Dartigues

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
32.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can We UseCells · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. FoliumPharmaceutical biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: The Role ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Strategies for the use of Ginkgo biloba extract, EGb 761CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy and safety ofNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. An Overview of Systematic Reviews ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hélène AmievaUniversity of Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, Bordeaux, France. helene.amieva@isped.u-bordeaux2.fr
Céline Meillon
Catherine Helmer
Pascale Barberger-Gateau
Jean François Dartigues
Bordeaux Population Health · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous studies have looked at the potential benefits of various nootropic drugs such as Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761®; Tanakan®) and piracetam (Nootropyl®) on age-related cognitive decline often leading to inconclusive results due to small sample sizes or insufficient follow-up duration. The present study assesses the association between intake of EGb761® and cognitive function of elderly adults over a 20-year period. METHODS AND

findingsThe data were gathered from the prospective community-based cohort study 'Paquid'. Within the study sample of 3612 non-demented participants aged 65 and over at baseline, three groups were compared: 589 subjects reporting use of EGb761® at at least one of the ten assessment visits, 149 subjects reporting use of piracetam at one of the assessment visits and 2874 subjects not reporting use of either EGb761® or piracetam. Decline on MMSE, verbal fluency and visual memory over the 20-year follow-up was analysed with a multivariate mixed linear effects model. A significant difference in MMSE decline over the 20-year follow-up was observed in the EGb761® and piracetam treatment groups compared to the 'neither treatment' group. These effects were in opposite directions: the EGb761® group declined less rapidly than the 'neither treatment' group, whereas the piracetam group declined more rapidly (β = -0.6). Regarding verbal fluency and visual memory, no difference was observed between the EGb761® group and the 'neither treatment' group (respectively, β = 0.21 and β = -0.03), whereas the piracetam group declined more rapidly (respectively, β = -1.40 and β = -0.44). When comparing the EGb761® and piracetam groups directly, a different decline was observed for the three tests (respectively β = -1.07, β = -1.61 and β = -0.41).

conclusionCognitive decline in a non-demented elderly population was lower in subjects who reported using EGb761® than in those who did not. This effect may be a specific medication effect of EGb761®, since it was not observed for another nootropic medication, piracetam.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognition DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGinkgo bilobaGinkgo ExtractHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNootropic AgentsPiracetamPlant ExtractsPopulation SurveillanceProspective StudiesTime FactorsGinkgo biloba extractGinkgo ExtractNootropic AgentsPiracetamPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID23326356
PMCPMC3543404
OpenAlexW2030455832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.