Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326303›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Use of a single hybrid imaging agent for integration of target validation with in vivo and ex vivo imaging of mouse tumor lesions resembling human DCIS.

Tessa Buckle, Joeri Kuil, Nynke S van den Berg, Anton Bunschoten, Hildo J Lamb, Hushan Yuan, Lee Josephson, Jos Jonkers, Alexander D Borowsky, Fijs W B van Leeuwen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biomarkers in preclinical cancer imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
  13. The ubiquitin-CXCR4 axis plays an important role in acute lung infection-enhanced lung tumor metastasis.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa BuckleDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joeri Kuil
Nynke S van den Berg
Anton Bunschoten
Hildo J Lamb
Hushan Yuan
Lee Josephson
Jos Jonkers
Alexander D Borowsky
Fijs W B van Leeuwen
Leiden University Medical Center · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLHarvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Reagents for the Design of Targeted Multifunctional NanomaterialsR01EB009691 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JOSEPHSON, LEE · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Multimodal Vital Fluorochromes for ImagingR01EB011996 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI JOSEPHSON, LEE · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCRR NIH HHS K26 RR0243037NIBIB NIH HHS EB011996NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB-009691NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009691NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB011996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledScreening of biomarker expression levels in tumor biopsy samples not only provides an assessment of prognostic and predictive factors, but may also be used for selection of biomarker-specific imaging strategies. To assess the feasibility of using a biopsy specimen for a personalized selection of an imaging agent, the chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) was used as a reference biomarker.

methodsA hybrid CXCR4 targeting peptide (MSAP-Ac-TZ14011) containing a fluorescent dye and a chelate for radioactive labeling was used to directly compare initial flow cytometry-based target validation in fresh tumor tissue to in vivo single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging.

resultsFlow cytometric analysis of mouse tumor derived cell suspensions enabled discrimination between 4T1 control tumor lesions (with low levels of CXCR4 expression) and CXCR4 positive early, intermediate and late stage MIN-O lesions based on their CXCR4 expression levels; CXCR4(basal), CXCR4(+) and CXCR4(++) cell populations could be accurately discriminated. Mean fluorescent intensity ratios between expression in MIN-O and 4T1 tissue found with flow cytometry were comparable to ratios obtained with in vivo SPECT/CT and fluorescence imaging, ex vivo fluorescence evaluation and standard immunohistochemistry.

conclusionThe hybrid nature of a targeting imaging agent like MSAP-Ac-TZ14011 enables integration of target selection, in vivo imaging and ex vivo validation using a single agent. The use of biopsy tissue for biomarker screening can readily be expanded to other targeting hybrid imaging agents and can possibly help increase the clinical applicability of tumor-specific imaging approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCell Line, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ImagingFeasibility StudiesFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesHumansImmunohistochemistryMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMolecular StructurePeptidesReceptors, CXCR4Reproducibility of ResultsCXCR4 protein, mouseFluorescent DyesPeptidesReceptors, CXCR4

Identifiers

PMID23326303
PMCPMC3543428
OpenAlexW2154281397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.