ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2013
How to set-up a long-distance mentoring program: a framework and case description of mentorship in HIV clinical trials.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A national HIV clinical mentorship program: Enabling Zambia to accelerate control of the HIV epidemic.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Feasibility of implementing formal long-distance mentorship for public health physicians: a case study of Association of Public Health Physicians of Nigeria.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Advice for Junior Faculty Regarding Academic Promotion: What Not to Worry About, and What to Worry About.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- Enhancing research publications and advancing scientific writing in health research collaborations: sharing lessons learnt from the trenches.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2018Article
- Output from the CIHR Canadian HIV Trials Network international postdoctoral fellowship for capacity building in HIV clinical trials.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Pursuing a Gastroenterology Fellowship as a Foreign Medical Graduate.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2017Article
- Mentoring health researchers globally: Diverse experiences, programmes, challenges and responses.Global public health · 2016Article
- CIHR canadian HIV trials network HIV workshop: ethical research through community participation and strengthening scientific validity.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
- Tips for charting the course of a successful health research career.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2013Article
- Distance mentoring of health researchers: Three case studies across the career-development trajectory.Health psychology openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mentoring plays an important role in learning and career development. Mentored researchers are more productive and more likely to publish their work. However, mentorship programs are not universally used in most settings or disciplines. Furthermore, successful and mutually beneficial mentoring relationships are not always easy to arrange. Long-distance mentoring relationships are even more difficult to handle and may break down for a wide variety of reasons. Drawing from our experiences with the first Canadian Institutes of Health Research - Canadian HIV Trials Network international postdoctoral fellowship program, we describe the roles of the context, the key mentor and the mentee attributes; goals and expectations; environments, local support, a communication plan, funding, face-to-face contact, multidisciplinary collaboration, co-mentoring, and evaluation as they apply to the successful implementation of a long-distance mentoring program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.