Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23326147›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

Itopride therapy for functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis.

Xuan Huang, Bin Lv, Shuo Zhang, Yi-Hong Fan, Li-Na Meng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07449689 (A Double-Blind Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acotiamide vs Itopride for Functional Dyspepsia Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07449689 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Double-Blind Superiority Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acotiamide vs Itopride for Functional Dyspepsia Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled368ConditionsFunctioanl Dyspepsia, Post Prandial Distress SyndromeArmsAcotiamide, itopride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Chinese herbal medicines for functional dyspepsia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MODERN APPROACH TO DYSPEPSIA.Acta clinica Croatica · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Dyspepsia in Korea.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuan HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China.
Bin Lv
Shuo Zhang
Yi-Hong Fan
Li-Na Meng
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the therapeutic effects of itopride vs other drugs (placebo, domperidone, mosapride) for functional dyspepsia (FD).

methodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of itopride for FD were retrieved from databases. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed, using the relative risk (RR) and weighted mean deviation, as appropriate. A random or fixed effect model was used, based on the heterogeneity of the included articles, and visual inspection of funnel plots was used to evaluate publication bias.

resultsNine RCTs enrolling 2620 FD cases were included; 1372 cases received itopride treatment and 1248 cases received placebo or other drugs (control groups). Compared with control groups, itopride had superior RR values of 1.11 [95%CI: (1.03, 1.19), P = 0.006], 1.21 [95%CI: (1.03, 1.44), P = 0.02], and 1.24 [95%CI: (1.01, 1.53), P = 0.04] for global patient assessment, postprandial fullness, and early satiety, respectively. For the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire score, the weighted mean deviation was -1.38 [95%CI: (-1.75, -1.01), P < 0.01]. The incidence of adverse effects was similar in the itopride and control groups. The funnel plots for all indicators showed no evidence of publication bias.

conclusionItopride has good efficacy in terms of global patients assessment, postprandial fullness, and early satiety in the treatment of patients with FD and shows a low rate of adverse reactions. Itopride can greatly improve FD syndromes-score.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsBenzamidesBenzyl CompoundsDomperidoneDyspepsiaGastrointestinal AgentsHumansMorpholinesPostprandial PeriodRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskSatiationTreatment OutcomeAntiemeticsBenzamidesBenzyl CompoundsDomperidoneGastrointestinal AgentsitoprideMorpholinesmosaprideFunctional dyspepsiaItoprideMeta-analysisProkinetic agentsRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID23326147
PMCPMC3544044
OpenAlexW2093762678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.