Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23325841›Full record

ArticleBlood2013

International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) & European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) consensus response criteria in advanced systemic mastocytosis.

Jason Gotlib, Animesh Pardanani, Cem Akin, Andreas Reiter, Tracy George, Olivier Hermine, Hanneke Kluin-Nelemans, Karin Hartmann, Wolfgang R Sperr, Knut Brockow and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Mastocytosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.

Jason GotlibStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA;
Animesh Pardanani
Cem Akin
Andreas Reiter
Tracy George
Olivier Hermine
Hanneke Kluin-Nelemans
Karin Hartmann
Wolfgang R Sperr
Knut Brockow
Lawrence B Schwartz
Alberto Orfao
Daniel J Deangelo
Michel Arock
Karl Sotlar
Hans-Peter Horny
Dean D Metcalfe
Luis Escribano
Srdan Verstovsek
Ayalew Tefferi
Peter Valent
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMedical University of Vienna · ATStanford University · USUniversidad de Salamanca · ESCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRHarvard University · USHeidelberg University · DENational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Cologne · DEVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

The Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, And Treatment Of Systemic Mast Cell DisordersZIAAI000249 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI KOMAROW, HIRSH D · 2009 to 2025
$16.5M
Pathogenesis and Treatment of Idiopathic AnaphylaxisZIAAI001092 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CARTER, MELODY C · 2009 to 2025
$10.8M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is characterized by accumulation of neoplastic mast cells and is classified into indolent and aggressive forms. The latter include aggressive SM (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM associated with a myeloid neoplasm wherein 1 or both disease compartments exhibit advanced features. These variants, henceforth collectively referred to as advanced SM for the purposes of this report, are typically characterized by organ damage and shortened survival duration. In contrast to indolent SM, in which symptoms are usually managed by noncytotoxic antimediator therapy, cytoreduction is usually necessary for disease control in advanced SM. Unfortunately, current drug treatment of these patients rarely results in complete clinical and histopathologic remissions or improved survival time. Previously defined response criteria were adapted to the heterogeneous presentations of advanced SM and the limited effects of available drugs. However, recent advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of SM and the corresponding prospect in targeted therapy make it a priority to modify these criteria. Our current study is the product of an international group of experts and summarizes the challenges in accomplishing this task and forwards a new proposal for response criteria, which builds on prior proposals and should facilitate response evaluation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCommunity NetworksConsensusClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionEuropeHematologic DiseasesHumansInternational CooperationMastocytosisMastocytosis, SystemicOrgan Dysfunction ScoresSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID23325841
PMCPMC3612852
OpenAlexW1964608118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.