ArticleBiopolymers2012
Effects of gadolinium chelate on the evolution of the nanoscale structure in peptide hydrogels.
Article in Biopolymers, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Supramolecular Hydrogelators and Hydrogels: From Soft Matter to Molecular Biomaterials.Chemical reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) was used to monitor peptide hydrogelation with and without the MRI contrast agent gadolinium chelate (Gd(III)-chelate). The gelators are a pair of decapeptides that are self-repulsive but mutually attractive. Gd(III)-chelate was either free or covalently bound to one of the decapeptides. Free and conjugated Gd(III)-chelate have the opposite effects on peptide gelation: free Gd(III)-chelate slows down gelation while having little effect on the cross-sectional area of peptide fibers; covalently conjugated Gd(III)-chelate speeds up gelation and results in peptide fibers with significantly greater cross-sectional area. After 24 h of gelation, the cross-sectional areas of hydrogels with no Gd(III)-chelate, with free Gd(III)-chelate and with conjugated Gd(III) chelate are 3700, 3800, and 6300 Å(2), respectively. Free Gd(III)-chelate is not incorporated into peptide fibers and remains in solution with little effect on MRI intensity upon gelation. In contrast, covalently conjugated Gd(III)-chelate is not only incorporated into peptide fibers, but further aggregates toward the center of the peptide fibers. In conclusion, to visualize hydrogelation using (1)H MRI, it is necessary to conjugate Gd(III)-chelate to the material covalently and use T(2)-weighted imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.