Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23325438›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2013

Effect of proton pump inhibitor on esophageal eosinophilia.

Shauna Schroeder, Kelley E Capocelli, Joanne C Masterson, Rachel Harris, Cheryl Protheroe, James J Lee, Glenn T Furuta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Technical review on the management of eosinophilic esophagitis: a report from the AGA institute and the joint task force on allergy-immunology practice parameters.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
  11. Systematic review of histological remission criteria in eosinophilic esophagitis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Gastroenteritis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shauna SchroederSection of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Kelley E Capocelli
Joanne C Masterson
Rachel Harris
Cheryl Protheroe
James J Lee
Glenn T Furuta
University of Colorado Denver · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

EOSINOPHIL ACTIVITIES IN MURINE MODELS OF LUNG DISEASER01HL065228 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MED, MAYO CLINIC AZ · PI JACOBSEN, ELIZABETH A · 2000 to 2017
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL065228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDifferentiation between the common etiologies of dense esophageal eosinophilia such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis can be difficult. We hypothesized that histologic features may provide diagnostic clues concerning the etiology of esophageal eosinophilia.

methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 204 children with the diagnosis of esophagitis characterized by ≥ 15 eosinophils (eos) per high-power field (HPF) in at least 1 biopsy. We then restricted our analysis to subjects who had received at least 8 weeks of only proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) followed by endoscopy and who had a clinicopathologic response to this treatment. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, and pathologic descriptions were reviewed and an eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) index was determined to assess for degranulation/eosinophil activation.

resultsOf the 204 identified charts, 7 subjects identified met the inclusion criteria. Five of these 7 patients showed a clinicopathologic response to PPIs after their follow-up endoscopy, (mean peak eosinophil count: 92 vs 5 eos/HPF, and EPX index: 39.2 vs 14.6, pre- and posttreatment, respectively). Two patients experienced initial resolution of symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia with PPI therapy; however, within 17-23 months they redeveloped symptoms and esophageal eosinophilia while receiving PPI therapy at the time of a third endoscopy (mean peak eosinophil count: 40 vs 11 vs 36 eos/HPF, and EPX index: 44 vs 21 vs 36.5, pre-, post- and posttreatment, respectively). No clinicopathologic features or degranulation patterns differentiated subjects with GERD/PPI responsive esophageal eosinophilia from those who had transient response to PPI treatment.

conclusionsNo clinicopathologic features differentiated subjects who responded to PPI treatment. PPI treatment can be helpful to exclude GERD and PPI responsive esophageal eosinophilia but long-term follow-up is critical in the management of esophagitis.

Indexed as

Proton Pump InhibitorsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEosinophiliaEosinophilic EsophagitisEosinophil PeroxidaseEosinophilsEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesEosinophil PeroxidaseProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23325438
PMCPMC3552376
OpenAlexW2024449267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.