Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23325057›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2013

Predictors of initial uptake of human papillomavirus vaccine uptake among rural Appalachian young women.

Baretta R Casey, Richard A Crosby, Robin C Vanderpool, Mark Dignan, Wallace Bates

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fatalistic beliefs and completion of the HPV vaccination series among a sample of young Appalachian Kentucky women.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2015
    Article
  11. Sources of HPV vaccine hesitancy in parents.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Baretta R CaseyRural Cancer Prevention Center, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, 151 Washington Avenue, 346 Bowman Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0059, USA. bcase2@email.uky.edu
Richard A Crosby
Robin C Vanderpool
Mark Dignan
Wallace Bates
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

THE RURAL CANCER PREVENTION CENTER: CATEGORY 1 PROPOSALU48DP001932 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI CROSBY, RICHARD A · 2009 to 2013
$5.2M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS 1U48DP00193201NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP001932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women in Appalachian Kentucky experience a high burden of cervical cancer and have low rates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. The purpose of this study was to identify normative influences predicting initial HPV vaccine uptake among a sample of young women in southeastern Kentucky. Women (N = 495), ages 18 through 26 years, were recruited from clinics and community colleges. After completing a questionnaire, women received a free voucher for HPV vaccination. Whether women redeemed the voucher for Dose 1 served as the primary outcome variable. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the influence of healthcare providers, friends, mothers, and fathers on vaccine uptake. One-quarter of the total sample (25.9%) received Dose 1. Uptake was higher in the clinic sample (45.1%) than in the college sample (6.9%). On multivariate analysis, women indicating that their healthcare provider suggested the vaccine, that their friends would "definitely" want them to be vaccinated, and that their fathers would "definitely" want them to receive the vaccine all were 1.6 times more likely to receive Dose 1. Interaction effects occurred between recruitment site (clinic vs. community college) and all three of the normative influences retaining multivariate significance, indicating that the associations only applied to the clinic sample. HPV vaccine interventions may benefit from highlighting paternal endorsement, healthcare provider recommendation, and peer support.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAppalachian RegionAttitude to HealthFemaleHumansKentuckyPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23325057
PMCPMC4758115
OpenAlexW2006162311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.