ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2013
Non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque visualization on CT: effects of contrast-enhancement and lipid-content fractions.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The biomedical knowledge graph of symptom phenotype in coronary artery plaque: machine learning-based analysis of real-world clinical data.BioData mining · 2024Article
- A study of the relationship between brachial artery vasodilation and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in diabetic patients with coronary atherosclerosis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
- The association of hemoglobin A1c and high risk plaque and plaque extent assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2016Article
- Correction of lumen contrast-enhancement influence on non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque quantification on CT.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2015Article
- A novel method for non-invasive plaque morphology analysis by coronary computed tomography angiography.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) may characterize lipid-rich and presumably rupture-prone non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque based on its Hounsfield-Unit (HU), but still inconclusively. This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing the HU-value of non-calcified plaque using software simulation. Several realistic virtual plaqueburdened coronary phantoms were constructed at 5 μm resolution. CT scanning was simulated with settings resembling a 64-row multi-detector CT (64-MDCT) and reconstructed at 64-MDCT (0.4 mm) and MicroCT (48 μm) resolutions. Influences of lumen contrast-enhancement, stenosis-grades, and plaque compositions on plaque visualization were analyzed. Lumen contrast-enhancement and mean plaque HU-value were positively correlated (R(2) > 0.92), with approximately the same slopes for all plaque compositions. Percentage lipid-content and mean plaque HU-value were negatively correlated (R(2) > 0.98). Stenosis-grade and noise had minimal influence on the correlations. Influence of lumen contrast-enhancement on plaque HU-value was following a specific exponentially declining pattern (y = Ae(-λx) + c) from the lumen border until 2-pixel radius. Outside 2-pixel radius, plaque HU-values deviated maximally 5 HU from non-contrast-enhanced reference. Thus, to avoid lumen contrast-enhancement influence, plaques should be measured outside 2-pixel radius from the lumen border. Based on the patterns found, a lumen influence correction algorithm may be developed. HU-based plaque percentage lipid-content determination might serve as an alternative plaque characterization method. However, its applicability is still hindered by many inherent limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23324971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.