Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23324433›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2013

Subchondral pre-solidified chitosan/blood implants elicit reproducible early osteochondral wound-repair responses including neutrophil and stromal cell chemotaxis, bone resorption and repair, enhanced repair tissue integration and delayed matrix deposition.

Charles-Hubert Lafantaisie-Favreau, Jessica Guzmán-Morales, Jun Sun, Gaoping Chen, Adam Harris, Thomas D Smith, Alberto Carli, Janet Henderson, William D Stanish, Caroline D Hoemann

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Knee cartilage defect: marrow stimulating techniques.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2015
    Article
  7. Bone substitutes and implantation depths for subchondral bone repair in osteochondral defects of porcine knee joints.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Charles-Hubert Lafantaisie-FavreauInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, École Polytechnique, C,P, 6079 succ, Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3A7, Canada.
Jessica Guzmán-Morales
Jun Sun
Gaoping Chen
Adam Harris
Thomas D Smith
Alberto Carli
Janet Henderson
William D Stanish
Caroline D Hoemann
Polytechnique Montréal · CADalhousie University · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAMontreal General Hospital · CAPiramal (Canada) · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 185810-BME
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study we evaluated a novel approach to guide the bone marrow-driven articular cartilage repair response in skeletally aged rabbits. We hypothesized that dispersed chitosan particles implanted close to the bone marrow degrade in situ in a molecular mass-dependent manner, and attract more stromal cells to the site in aged rabbits compared to the blood clot in untreated controls.

methodsThree microdrill hole defects, 1.4 mm diameter and 2 mm deep, were created in both knee trochlea of 30 month-old New Zealand White rabbits. Each of 3 isotonic chitosan solutions (150, 40, 10 kDa, 80% degree of deaceylation, with fluorescent chitosan tracer) was mixed with autologous rabbit whole blood, clotted with tissue factor to form cylindrical implants, and press-fit in drill holes in the left knee while contralateral holes received tissue factor or no treatment. At day 1 or day 21 post-operative, defects were analyzed by micro-computed tomography, histomorphometry and stereology for bone and soft tissue repair.

resultsAll 3 implants filled the top of defects at day 1 and were partly degraded in situ at 21 days post-operative. All implants attracted neutrophils, osteoclasts and abundant bone marrow-derived stromal cells, stimulated bone resorption followed by new woven bone repair (bone remodeling) and promoted repair tissue-bone integration. 150 kDa chitosan implant was less degraded, and elicited more apoptotic neutrophils and bone resorption than 10 kDa chitosan implant. Drilled controls elicited a poorly integrated fibrous or fibrocartilaginous tissue.

conclusionsPre-solidified implants elicit stromal cells and vigorous bone plate remodeling through a phase involving neutrophil chemotaxis. Pre-solidified chitosan implants are tunable by molecular mass, and could be beneficial for augmented marrow stimulation therapy if the recruited stromal cells can progress to bone and cartilage repair.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsChemotaxisAnimalsBlood CoagulationBone ResorptionCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesChitosanDrug ImplantsExtracellular MatrixFemaleKnee JointMaleModels, AnimalMolecular WeightNeutrophilsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanDrug ImplantsThromboplastin

Identifiers

PMID23324433
PMCPMC3602124
OpenAlexW2118362648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.