Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23324134›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2013

Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: stochastic and non-stationary effects.

Marc Weber, Javier Buceta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Consensus Formation and Change are Enhanced by Neutrality.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypic memory in quorum sensing.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Agent-based model of angiogenesis simulates capillary sprout initiation in multicellular networks.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015
    Article
  17. Multi-stable dynamics of the non-adiabatic repressilator.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015
    Article
  18. Can the natural diversity of quorum-sensing advance synthetic biology?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc WeberComputer Simulation and Modelling (Co,S,Mo,) Lab, Parc Científic de Barcelona, C/ Baldiri Reixac 4, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
Javier Buceta
Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA wide range of bacteria species are known to communicate through the so called quorum sensing (QS) mechanism by means of which they produce a small molecule that can freely diffuse in the environment and in the cells. Upon reaching a threshold concentration, the signalling molecule activates the QS-controlled genes that promote phenotypic changes. This mechanism, for its simplicity, has become the model system for studying the emergence of a global response in prokaryotic cells. Yet, how cells precisely measure the signal concentration and act coordinately, despite the presence of fluctuations that unavoidably affects cell regulation and signalling, remains unclear.

resultsWe propose a model for the QS signalling mechanism in Vibrio fischeri based on the synthetic strains lux01 and lux02. Our approach takes into account the key regulatory interactions between LuxR and LuxI, the autoinducer transport, the cellular growth and the division dynamics. By using both deterministic and stochastic models, we analyze the response and dynamics at the single-cell level and compare them to the global response at the population level. Our results show how fluctuations interfere with the synchronization of the cell activation and lead to a bimodal phenotypic distribution. In this context, we introduce the concept of precision in order to characterize the reliability of the QS communication process in the colony. We show that increasing the noise in the expression of LuxR helps cells to get activated at lower autoinducer concentrations but, at the same time, slows down the global response. The precision of the QS switch under non-stationary conditions decreases with noise, while at steady-state it is independent of the noise value.

conclusionsOur in silico experiments show that the response of the LuxR/LuxI system depends on the interplay between non-stationary and stochastic effects and that the burst size of the transcription/translation noise at the level of LuxR controls the phenotypic variability of the population. These results, together with recent experimental evidences on LuxR regulation in wild-type species, suggest that bacteria have evolved mechanisms to regulate the intensity of those fluctuations.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPhenotypeAliivibrio fischeriBacterial ProteinsCell DivisionGene Regulatory NetworksQuorum SensingRepressor ProteinsStochastic ProcessesTime FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsLuxI protein, BacteriaLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23324134
PMCPMC3614889
OpenAlexW1971405901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.