ArticleBMC systems biology2013
Dynamics of the quorum sensing switch: stochastic and non-stationary effects.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Experimentally Verified Mechanistic Model for Predicting Quorum Sensing-Based Switches.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Consensus Formation and Change are Enhanced by Neutrality.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Quasi-Stationary Distribution Bound for Fault Analysis in Gene Regulatory Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Physical communication pathways in bacteria: an extra layer to quorum sensing.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- From single cells to communities: Mathematical perspectives on bacterial quorum sensing.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Role of intercellular interactions on single cell and population level responses: considerations for multicellular bioreporter design.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Phenotypic memory in quorum sensing.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Cooperation in bioluminescence: understanding the role of autoinducers by a stochastic random resistor model.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2023Article
- Diversity of bet-hedging strategies in microbial communities-Recent cases and insights.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- Unravelling the γ-butyrolactone network in Streptomyces coelicolor by computational ensemble modelling.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Spatial quorum sensing modelling using coloured hybrid Petri nets and simulative model checking.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Bacterial bioluminescence onset and quenching: a dynamical model for aRoyal Society open science · 2017Article
- The cellular Ising model: a framework for phase transitions in multicellular environments.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2016Article
- Multi-objective optimization framework to obtain model-based guidelines for tuning biological synthetic devices: an adaptive network case.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Distinct promoter activation mechanisms modulate noise-driven HIV gene expression.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Agent-based model of angiogenesis simulates capillary sprout initiation in multicellular networks.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015Article
- Multi-stable dynamics of the non-adiabatic repressilator.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015Article
- Can the natural diversity of quorum-sensing advance synthetic biology?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Review
- A bottom-up characterization of transfer functions for synthetic biology designs: lessons from enzymology.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Modeling and validation of autoinducer-mediated bacterial gene expression in microfluidic environments.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA wide range of bacteria species are known to communicate through the so called quorum sensing (QS) mechanism by means of which they produce a small molecule that can freely diffuse in the environment and in the cells. Upon reaching a threshold concentration, the signalling molecule activates the QS-controlled genes that promote phenotypic changes. This mechanism, for its simplicity, has become the model system for studying the emergence of a global response in prokaryotic cells. Yet, how cells precisely measure the signal concentration and act coordinately, despite the presence of fluctuations that unavoidably affects cell regulation and signalling, remains unclear.
resultsWe propose a model for the QS signalling mechanism in Vibrio fischeri based on the synthetic strains lux01 and lux02. Our approach takes into account the key regulatory interactions between LuxR and LuxI, the autoinducer transport, the cellular growth and the division dynamics. By using both deterministic and stochastic models, we analyze the response and dynamics at the single-cell level and compare them to the global response at the population level. Our results show how fluctuations interfere with the synchronization of the cell activation and lead to a bimodal phenotypic distribution. In this context, we introduce the concept of precision in order to characterize the reliability of the QS communication process in the colony. We show that increasing the noise in the expression of LuxR helps cells to get activated at lower autoinducer concentrations but, at the same time, slows down the global response. The precision of the QS switch under non-stationary conditions decreases with noise, while at steady-state it is independent of the noise value.
conclusionsOur in silico experiments show that the response of the LuxR/LuxI system depends on the interplay between non-stationary and stochastic effects and that the burst size of the transcription/translation noise at the level of LuxR controls the phenotypic variability of the population. These results, together with recent experimental evidences on LuxR regulation in wild-type species, suggest that bacteria have evolved mechanisms to regulate the intensity of those fluctuations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.