Trial reportInformatics for health & social care2013
Older adults' satisfaction with a medication dispensing device in home care.
Trial report in Informatics for health & social care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient experiences with technology enabled care across healthcare settings- a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review.International journal of medical informatics · 2013Pooled it
- Medication adherence support of an in-home electronic medication dispensing system for individuals living with chronic conditions: a pilot randomized controlled trial.BMC geriatrics · 2021Trial
- Supporting the Medication Adherence of Older Mexican Adults Through External Cues Provided With Ambient Displays: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Information and Communication Technologies for Chronic Disease Self-Management in Adults Aged 65 Years and Older: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- A scoping review of digital health technologies in multimorbidity management: mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and strategies.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Improved Medication Adherence of an Elderly Diabetic Patient at a Dwelling Home Using a Pill Dispenser and Personal Health Records.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Usability of an automated medication dispensation device and adherence dashboard: A study protocol.PloS one · 2024Article
- Technologies for Managing the Health of Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Trends in Telecare Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- An electronic pillbox intervention designed to improve medication safety during care transitions: challenges and lessons learned regarding implementation and evaluation.BMC health services research · 2022Review
- Older Adults' and Clinicians' Perspectives on a Smart Health Platform for the Aging Population: Design and Evaluation Study.JMIR aging · 2022Article
- Study on the Types of Elderly Intelligent Health Management Technology and the Influencing Factors of Its Adoption.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- PRN Medicines Management for Older People with Long-Term Mental Health Disorders in Home Care.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Review
- Stakeholder Feedback of Electronic Medication Adherence Products: Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of a health-social partnership program for discharged non-frail older adults: a pilot study.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- A Prospective Study of Usability and Workload of Electronic Medication Adherence Products by Older Adults, Caregivers, and Health Care Providers.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Health professionals' experiences with the implementation of a digital medication dispenser in home care services - a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Users' Perceptions of an in-Home Electronic Medication Dispensing System: A Qualitative Study.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOlder adults with multiple chronic conditions face the complex task of medication management involving multiple medications of varying doses at different times. Advances in telehealth technologies have resulted in home-based devices for medication management and health monitoring of older adults. We examined older adults' perceptions of a telehealth medication dispensing device as part of a clinical trial involving home healthcare clients, nurse coordination and use of the medication dispensing device.
methodsNinety-six frail older adult participants who used the medication dispensing device for 12 months completed a satisfaction survey related to perceived usefulness and reliability. Results were analyzed and grouped by themes in the following areas: Ease of Use, Reliability, Medication Management Assistance, Routine Task Performance and Acceptability.
resultsNearly all participants perceived the medication dispensing device as very easy to use, very reliable and helpful in the management of their medications. Eighty-four percent of participants expressed a desire to use the machine in the future.
conclusionThe technology-enhanced medication management device in this study is an acceptable tool for older adults to manage medication in collaboration with home care nurses. Improved usability and cost models for medication dispensers are areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.