Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23323562›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic delivery2012

Micro- and nano-fabricated implantable drug-delivery systems.

Ellis Meng, Tuan Hoang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic delivery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. [Research progress of nanomaterials in osteomyelitis treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Microfabrication for Drug Delivery.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ellis MengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1111, USA. ellis.meng@usc.edu
Tuan Hoang

Funding

Microinfusion Pump For Animal Functional Brain MappingR01NS050171 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HOLSCHNEIDER, DANIEL PHILIPP · 2005 to 2007
$1.0M
Wirelessly-operated Implantable MEMS Micropumps for Drug Infusion in MiceR21GM104583 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MENG, ELLIS · 2012 to 2014
$556k
Implantable MEMS Drug Delivery Device for Glaucoma ManagementR21EY018490 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MENG, ELLIS · 2007 to 2008
$448k
Implantable Minipump For Tetherless Drug Self-Administration In MiceR21DA026970 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HOLSCHNEIDER, DANIEL PHILIPP · 2009 to 2010
$325k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY018490NEI NIH HHS R21EY018490NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026970NIDA NIH HHS R21DA026970NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM104583NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050171NINDS NIH HHS R01NS050171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable drug-delivery systems provide new means for achieving therapeutic drug concentrations over entire treatment durations in order to optimize drug action. This article focuses on new drug administration modalities achieved using implantable drug-delivery systems that are enabled by micro- and nano-fabrication technologies, and microfluidics. Recent advances in drug administration technologies are discussed and remaining challenges are highlighted.

Indexed as

Infusion Pumps, ImplantableMicrofluidicsNanotechnologyAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID23323562
PMCPMC3576846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.