ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2012
Esophageal tissue engineering: a new approach for esophageal replacement.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technique for decellularization and characterization of rat esophageal extracellular matrix for potential application as a 3D scaffold.Bioengineered · 2025Article
- Effect of melatonin on passive, ex-vivo biomechanical behavior of lamb esophagus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Methods for Modifying Mechanical Properties of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Clinical Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Assessment of Esophageal Reconstruction via Bioreactor Cultivation of a Synthetic Scaffold in a Canine Model.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- Bio-Engineered Scaffolds Derived from Decellularized Human Esophagus for Functional Organ Reconstruction.Cells · 2022Article
- Development of Bio-artificial Esophageal Tissue Engineering Utilization for Circumferential Lesion Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2022Review
- Engineered Full Thickness Electrospun Scaffold for Esophageal Tissue Regeneration: From In Vitro to In Vivo Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Decellularized esophageal tubular scaffold microperforated by quantum molecular resonance technology and seeded with mesenchymal stromal cells for tissue engineering esophageal regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- A narrative review of esophageal tissue engineering and replacement: where are we?Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Development of a Decellularized Porcine Esophageal Matrix for Potential Applications in Cancer Modeling.Cells · 2021Article
- Strategies for treating oesophageal diseases with stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2020Review
- Tissue Engineered Esophageal Patch by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Optimization of Electrospun Patch Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Successful muscle regeneration by a homologous microperforated scaffold seeded with autologous mesenchymal stromal cells in a porcine esophageal substitution model.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Optimization of Decellularization Procedure in Rat Esophagus for Possible Development of a Tissue Engineered Construct.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Multi-stage bioengineering of a layered oesophagus with in vitro expanded muscle and epithelial adult progenitors.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Regenerative medicine for the esophagus.Surgery today · 2018Review
- Surgical techniques for esophageal replacement in children.Pediatric surgery international · 2017Review
- Decellularized scaffolds in regenerative medicine.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Nondestructive measurement of esophageal biaxial mechanical properties utilizing sonometry.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016Article
- Tissue-engineered artificial oesophagus patch using three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone with mesenchymal stem cells: a preliminary report.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A number of congenital and acquired disorders require esophageal tissue replacement. Various surgical techniques, such as gastric and colonic interposition, are standards of treatment, but frequently complicated by stenosis and other problems. Regenerative medicine approaches facilitate the use of biological constructs to replace or regenerate normal tissue function. We review the literature of esophageal tissue engineering, discuss its implications, compare the methodologies that have been employed and suggest possible directions for the future. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, National Research Register and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched with the following search terms: stem cell and esophagus, esophageal replacement, esophageal tissue engineering, esophageal substitution. Reference lists of papers identified were also examined and experts in this field contacted for further information. All full-text articles in English of all potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed. Tissue engineering has involved acellular scaffolds that were either transplanted with the aim of being repopulated by host cells or seeded prior to transplantation. When acellular scaffolds were used to replace patch and short tubular defects they allowed epithelial and partial muscular migration whereas when employed for long tubular defects the results were poor leading to an increased rate of stenosis and mortality. Stenting has been shown as an effective means to reduce stenotic changes and promote cell migration, whilst omental wrapping to induce vascularization of the construct has an uncertain benefit. Decellularized matrices have been recently suggested as the optimal choice for scaffolds, but smart polymers that will incorporate signalling to promote cell-scaffold interaction may provide a more reproducible and available solution. Results in animal models that have used seeded scaffolds strongly suggest that seeding of both muscle and epithelial cells on scaffolds prior to implantation is a prerequisite for complete esophageal replacement. Novel approaches need to be designed to allow for peristalsis and vascularization in the engineered esophagus. Although esophageal tissue engineering potentially offers a real alternative to conventional treatments for severe esophageal disease, important barriers remain that need to be addressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.