Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23322381›Full record

ReviewClinical & experimental metastasis2013

In vivo animal models for studying brain metastasis: value and limitations.

Inderjit Daphu, Terje Sundstrøm, Sindre Horn, Peter C Huszthy, Simone P Niclou, Per Ø Sakariassen, Heike Immervoll, Hrvoje Miletic, Rolf Bjerkvig, Frits Thorsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biological profile of breast cancer brain metastasis.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current preclinical models of brain metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The path to leptomeningeal metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Advances in Brain Metastasis Models.Brain tumor research and treatment · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Inderjit DaphuNorLux Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, 5019, Bergen, Norway.
Terje Sundstrøm
Sindre Horn
Peter C Huszthy
Simone P Niclou
Per Ø Sakariassen
Heike Immervoll
Hrvoje Miletic
Rolf Bjerkvig
Frits Thorsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain metastasis is associated with a particular poor prognosis. Novel insight into the brain metastatic process is therefore warranted. Several preclinical models of brain tumor metastasis have been developed during the last 60 years, and they have in part revealed some of the mechanisms underlying the metastatic process. This review discusses mechanisms of brain metastasis with a key focus of the development of animal model systems. This includes the use of rodent, syngeneic brain metastasis models (spontaneous, chemically induced and genetically engineered models) and human xenotransplantation models (ectopic inoculation and orthotopic models). Current information indicates that none of these fully reflect tumor development seen in patients with metastatic disease. The various model systems used, however, have provided important insight into specific mechanisms of the metastatic process related to the brain. By combining the knowledge obtained from animal models, new important information on the molecular mechanisms behind metastasis will be obtained, leading to the future development of new therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsHumansMiceRats

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.