Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23322207›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2013

Carcinoembryonic antigen is the preferred biomarker for in vivo colorectal cancer targeting.

J P Tiernan, S L Perry, E T Verghese, N P West, S Yeluri, D G Jayne, T A Hughes

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intraoperative molecular imaging of colorectal lung metastases with SGM-101: a feasibility study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TargetedJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A high-affinity CEA-targeted nanobody forJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J P TiernanLeeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, St. James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. jimtiernan1@gmail.com
S L Perry
E T Verghese
N P West
S Yeluri
D G Jayne
T A Hughes

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health NIHR-RP-011-029Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer-specific biomarkers have been used as molecular targets for fluorescent intra-operative imaging, targeted PET/MRI, and selective cytotoxic drug delivery yet the selection of biomarkers used is rarely evidence-based. We evaluated sensitivities and specificites of four of the most commonly used markers: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumour-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72), folate receptor-α (FRα) and Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR).

methodsMarker expression was evaluated semi-quantitatively in matched mucosal and colorectal cancer tissues from 280 patients using immunohistochemistry (scores of 0-15). Matched positive and negative lymph nodes from 18 patients were also examined.

resultsMarkers were more highly expressed in tumour tissue than in matched normal tissue in 98.8%, 79.0%, 37.1% and 32.8% of cases for CEA, TAG-72, FRα and EGFR, respectively. Carcinoembryonic antigen showed the greatest differential expression, with tumours scoring a mean of 10.8 points higher than normal tissues (95% CI 10.31-11.21, P<0.001). Similarly, CEA showed the greatest differential expression between positive and negative lymph nodes. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed CEA to have the best sensitivity (93.7%) and specificity (96.1%) for colorectal cancer detection.

conclusionCarcinoembryonic antigen has the greatest potential to allow highly specific tumour imaging and drug delivery; future translational research should aim to exploit this.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesColonColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsFemaleFolate Receptor 1Follow-Up StudiesGlycoproteinsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsFolate Receptor 1Glycoproteinstumor-associated antigen 72

Identifiers

PMID23322207
PMCPMC3593555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.