Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23322160›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2013

Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Rui Zhang, Rebecca M Howell, Annelise Giebeler, Phillip J Taddei, Anita Mahajan, Wayne D Newhauser

Abstract readCase ReportsComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Out-of-field dose in stereotactic radiotherapy for paediatric patients.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Paediatric proton therapy.The British journal of radiology · 2020
    Review
  15. A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects.Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rui ZhangGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Rebecca M Howell
Annelise Giebeler
Phillip J Taddei
Anita Mahajan
Wayne D Newhauser
Radiation Oncology Associates · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Prediction of Second Cancer Risks for Children Treated with Proton - vs. - PhotonR01CA131463 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI NEWHAUSER, WAYNE D · 2008 to 2010
$767k
Radiotherapy outcomes for children in developing versus developed countriesK01TW008409 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI TADDEI, PHILLIP J · 2010 to 2013
$447k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW008409FIC NIH HHS K01TW008409NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA131463-01A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric patients who received radiation therapy are at risk of developing side effects such as radiogenic second cancer. We compared proton and photon therapies in terms of the predicted risk of second cancers for a 4 year old medulloblastoma patient receiving craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Two CSI treatment plans with 23.4 Gy or Gy (RBE) prescribed dose were computed: a three-field 6 MV photon therapy plan and a four-field proton therapy plan. The primary doses for both plans were determined using a commercial treatment planning system. Stray radiation doses for proton therapy were determined from Monte Carlo simulations, and stray radiation doses for photon therapy were determined from measured data. Dose-risk models based on the Biological Effects of Ionization Radiation VII report were used to estimate the risk of second cancer in eight tissues/organs. Baseline predictions of the relative risk for each organ were always less for proton CSI than for photon CSI at all attained ages. The total lifetime attributable risk of the incidence of second cancer considered after proton CSI was much lower than that after photon CSI, and the ratio of lifetime risk was 0.18. Uncertainty analysis revealed that the qualitative findings of this study were insensitive to any plausible changes of dose-risk models and mean radiation weighting factor for neutrons. Proton therapy confers lower predicted risk of second cancer than photon therapy for the pediatric medulloblastoma patient.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChild, PreschoolCraniospinal IrradiationDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansMaleMedulloblastomaMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryProton TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRiskTissue DistributionTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID23322160
PMCPMC3615542
OpenAlexW2127768135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.