ArticleIrish journal of medical science2013
Late presentation of HIV despite earlier opportunities for detection, experience from an Irish tertiary referral institution.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immediate treatment of acute HIV in a tertiary healthcare center: bridging gaps in communication using smartphones.HIV medicine · 2019Article
- Identifying missed clinical opportunities for the earlier diagnosis of HIV in Australia, a retrospective cohort data linkage study.PloS one · 2018Article
- Late presentation to HIV/AIDS care in Brazil among men who self-identify as heterosexual.Revista de saude publica · 2016Article
- Article
- Increasing HIV testing among African immigrants in ireland: challenges and opportunities.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2015Article
- Article
- What's pregnancy got to do with it? Late presentation to HIV/AIDS services in Northeastern Brazil.AIDS care · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLate presentation of HIV continues to undermine advances in the management of HIV. Opportunities to detect HIV at an earlier stage are often missed. Current estimates suggest that undiagnosed individuals comprise approximately one quarter of all people in the western world living with HIV. 'Testing-and-treating' this group has been proposed as a means to curb the HIV epidemic. In this study we assessed the characteristics of individuals newly diagnosed with HIV, and their utilisation of healthcare services in Ireland prior to their diagnosis.
methodsA retrospective review was undertaken of all patients newly diagnosed with HIV over a 27-month period. Patient demographics were recorded, as were details of healthcare contacts in the year preceding diagnosis. Individuals detected via screening of recent immigrants/asylum seekers were excluded.
resultsIn the period studied 114 patients received a new diagnosis of HIV, 59 met inclusion criteria. The majority (54%) fulfilled the European consensus definition for late presenters (CD4<350 cells/µl). 'Late presenters' were significantly more likely to be symptomatic at diagnosis (OR=4.62; 95% CI 1.45-14.67; p=0.015), diagnosed by acute tertiary hospital services (p=0.015), and 56% reported heterosexual mode of acquisition (OR=2.12; 95% CI 0.73-6.16; p=0.19). Patients detected via screening had significantly higher CD4 counts at diagnosis compared with those diagnosed due to symptoms (Median CD4 422 cells/µl; IQR 285-594 vs. 142 cells/µl; IQR 62-333; p=0.0007). 'Symptomatic' patients were significantly more likely to report prior healthcare contacts (OR 4.71; 95 % CI 1.32-16.79; p=0.013).
conclusionCurrent screening activities are inadequate. Unfortunately newly diagnosed HIV patients continue to be symptomatic, at advanced stages of disease, to acute hospital services. Heterosexual groups in particular are at risk for late detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.