ReviewThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Family history of cardiovascular disease, perceived cardiovascular disease risk, and health-related behavior: a review of the literature.
Review in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the Dutch-Flemish translated ABCD questionnaire to measure cardiovascular diseases knowledge and risk perception among adults.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Feasibility of Recruiting Families into a Heart Disease Prevention Program Based on Dietary Patterns.Nutrients · 2015Trial
- Association of lipid management-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices with LDL-C target attainment in patients with coronary heart disease: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Perceived Risk Perception of Future Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the Postpartum Period.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Smokers Versus Non-smokers: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Family history of premature CHD and risk factor control in patients with a recent ACS.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Article
- Sexual Dimorphism in Cardiometabolic Diseases: From Development to Senescence and Therapeutic Approaches.Cells · 2025Review
- The Influence of Lifestyle Modifications on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Preventing cardiovascular disease in at-risk patients: Results of a pilot behavioural health programme in general practice.The European journal of general practice · 2024Article
- Impact of tooth loss and patient characteristics on coronary artery calcium score classification and prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluating Risk Factors and the Burden of Silent Myocardial Ischemia Among Diabetic Patients.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Natural products targeting inflammation-related metabolic disorders: A comprehensive review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Timely referral to health centers for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: IraPEN national program.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular disease risk perception among community adults in South China: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Assessing awareness of long-term health risks among women with a history of preeclampsia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Perception Questionnaire.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Interaction analysis of lipid accumulation product and family history of diabetes on impaired fasting glucose and diabetes risk in population with normotension in Eastern China: a community-based cross-sectional survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMore than 82 million Americans have 1 or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 32.8% of all deaths in the United States. Although the evidence for the familial aggregation of CVD is strong, the relationship between family history (FH) of CVD, perceived risk for CVD, and health-related behavior is poorly understood.
objectiveThe objective of this article was to review and summarize the published research on the relationship between an FH of CVD, an individual's perceived risk, and health-related behavior to make recommendations for clinical practice and future research.
methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO to identify articles that examined the relationship between an FH of CVD, perceived CVD risk, and health-promoting behaviors. A total of 263 unique articles were reviewed. A total of 238 were excluded, resulting in a total of 25 articles included in the review.
resultsThere was a positive relationship between a reported FH of CVD and perceived risk. However, the relationship between an FH of CVD and health-related behavior change and perceived risk and behavior change was inconsistent.
conclusionsA person's awareness of his or her FH of CVD or his or her own risk for CVD is not a sufficient predictor of changes in his or her health-related behavior. Future studies are needed to better explain the processes by which perceived CVD risk or FH of CVD can be used to affect health-related behavior changes. It appears that both FH and perceived personal risk for CVD are necessary but not sufficient conditions to change health-related behavior in high-risk populations. Future studies should also test interventions that help individuals with an FH of CVD attribute increased personal risk to themselves for developing CVD, while providing lifestyle management options to minimize their risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.