Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23321782›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing

Family history of cardiovascular disease, perceived cardiovascular disease risk, and health-related behavior: a review of the literature.

Christopher C Imes, Frances Marcus Lewis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher C ImesChristopher C. Imes, PhD Postdoctoral Fellow, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Frances Marcus Lewis, PhD, FAAN Professor, Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle.
Frances Marcus Lewis
University of Washington · US

Funding

BIOBEHAVIORAL NURSING RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32NR007106 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LANDIS, CAROL A · 1999 to 2013
$4.6M
Targeting Research and Academic Training of Nurses in GenomicsT32NR009759 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CONLEY, YVETTE P · 2006 to 2025
$4.5M
NINR NIH HHS 5T32NR007106NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007106NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009759NINR NIH HHS T32NR009759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 82 million Americans have 1 or more forms of cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 32.8% of all deaths in the United States. Although the evidence for the familial aggregation of CVD is strong, the relationship between family history (FH) of CVD, perceived risk for CVD, and health-related behavior is poorly understood.

objectiveThe objective of this article was to review and summarize the published research on the relationship between an FH of CVD, an individual's perceived risk, and health-related behavior to make recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO to identify articles that examined the relationship between an FH of CVD, perceived CVD risk, and health-promoting behaviors. A total of 263 unique articles were reviewed. A total of 238 were excluded, resulting in a total of 25 articles included in the review.

resultsThere was a positive relationship between a reported FH of CVD and perceived risk. However, the relationship between an FH of CVD and health-related behavior change and perceived risk and behavior change was inconsistent.

conclusionsA person's awareness of his or her FH of CVD or his or her own risk for CVD is not a sufficient predictor of changes in his or her health-related behavior. Future studies are needed to better explain the processes by which perceived CVD risk or FH of CVD can be used to affect health-related behavior changes. It appears that both FH and perceived personal risk for CVD are necessary but not sufficient conditions to change health-related behavior in high-risk populations. Future studies should also test interventions that help individuals with an FH of CVD attribute increased personal risk to themselves for developing CVD, while providing lifestyle management options to minimize their risk.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorRisk Reduction BehaviorCardiovascular DiseasesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansLife StylePrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID23321782
PMCPMC3633646
OpenAlexW2071286995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.